Syllabus
Philosophy 4830
Senior Seminar in Philosophy of Perception
Section
001
Professor
Michael Tooley
MWF
10:00-10:50
Office hours: Monday 12 - 2, and
Wednesday, 12 - 1
Hellems 247
Hellems, Room 277
Textbooks
The texts that we shall be using
in this course are as follows:
David M. Armstrong, A Materialist
Theory of the Mind (New York: Humanities Press, 1968)
Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the
Veil of Perception (New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers, 2001)
Some topics will require
additional readings. Those readings will be available on
E-reserve.
Two useful sources of
(generally)
good overview articles for many of the central topics in this course
are
the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards (8
volumes,
plus a 1996 Supplement, edited by Donald M. Borchert; call
number:
B41 .E5), and the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited
by
Edward Craig (10 volumes; call number: B51 .R68). A copy of the
former is available in the Reference room of Norlin Library.
Copies of the latter are stored offsite.)
Another useful source, though
it is still in a
very
incomplete state, as many of the articles have not yet been written, is
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, found online at
http://plato.stanford.edu/
Required Work
1. Since this is a senior seminar, both regular attendance and
participation in seminar discussions is important.
2. Because it is a seminar, there will be no final examination.
3. The written work for the course will take the form of two essays,
with the option of writing a third essay. If you do two essays,
each will count for one-half of your final grade. If you do three
essays, your grade will be based upon the best two.
Each essay should be between 1500 and 2000 words in length. The
due dates for the essays are as follows:
First
Essay:
Monday,
March 10
Second
Essay:
Monday, April 14
Optional Third
Essay: Monday, April 28
A list of possible essay topics
is available on this course website. If there is a slightly
different topic on which you would like to write an essay, please
discuss the topic that you have in mind with me to see whether or not
it is suitable.
Class Web Site
Course materials can be found
online at the following location:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~tooley/Philosophy4830.html
Topics and Readings
I. Introduction: The Nature of Philosophy
II. Perception: A Brief
Overview
Michael Huemer, “Introduction: The Problem of Perceptual Knowledge”,
chapter I of Skepticism and the Veil
of Perception, pp. 1-5.
III. Skepticism
Michael Huemer, “The Lure of Radical
Skepticism”, chapter II of
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception, pp. 7-25.
Michael Huemer, “Easy Answers to Skepticism”, chapter III of Skepticism
and the Veil of Perception, pp. 27-49.
IV. David Armstrong’s Version of
Direct Realism
1. David M. Armstrong on
Knowledge and Inference
David M. Armstrong, “Knowledge and Inference”, chapter 9 of A Materialist Theory of the Mind,
pp. 187-207.
2. David M. Armstrong’s
Account of Perception and Sensory Illusion in Perception and the
Physical World
David Armstrong, “The Analysis of Sensory Illusion”, chapter 7 of Perception and the Physical World,
pp. 80-98. (E-reserve)
David Armstrong, “The Nature of Perception”, chapter 9 of Perception and the Physical World,
pp. 105-22. (E-reserve)
3. David Armstrong on
Perception and Belief
David M. Armstrong, “Perception and Belief”, chapter 10 of A Materialist Theory of the Mind,
pp. 208-244.
4. David Armstrong on
Perception and Behavior
David M. Armstrong, “Perception and Behavior”, chapter 11 of A Materialist Theory of the Mind,
pp. 245-269.
5. David Armstrong on the
Secondary Qualities
David M. Armstrong, “The Secondary Qualities”, chapter 12 of A Materialist Theory of the Mind,
pp. 270-290.
V. Michael Huemer on Direct Realism
Versus Indirect Realism
1. Michael Huemer’s Version of
Direct Realism
Michael Huemer, “A Version of Direct Realism”, chapter IV of Skepticism and the Veil of Perception,
pp. 51-92.
2. Michael Huemer’s Version of
Foundationalism
Michael Huemer, “A Version of Foundationalism”, chapter V of Skepticism and the Veil of Perception,
pp. 93-117.
3. Michael Huemer on Objections
to Direct Realism
Michael Huemer, “Objections to Direct Realism”, chapter VI of Skepticism and the Veil of Perception,
pp. 119-147.
4. Michael Huemer on an Objection to
Indirect Realism
Michael Huemer, “An Objection to Indirect Realism: The
Problem of Spatial Properties”, chapter VII of Skepticism and the Veil
of Perception, pp. 149-174.
5. Michael Huemer on Skepticism
and Direct Realism
Michael Huemer, “The Direct Realist’s Answer to Skepticism”, chapter
VIII of Skepticism and the Veil of
Perception, pp. 175-196.
VI. Frank Jackson and the
Existence of Sense-Data
Frank Jackson, “The Case for Sense Data”, chapter 4 of Perception: A Representative Theory,
pp. 88-119. (E-reserve)
Frank Jackson, “Color and Science”, chapter 5 of Perception: A Representative Theory,
pp. 120-137. (E-reserve)
VII. Indirect Realism and
the Problem of Skepticism
Michael Tooley, “A Refutation of Physical-World Skepticism?”
Statements Concerning Various
Matters
The University currently recommends the inclusion in all syllabi of
statements dealing with the following matters:
(1) Students with Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations
because of a disability, please submit to me a letter from Disability
Services in a timely manner so that your needs may be addressed.
Disability Services determines accommodations based on documented
disabilities. Contact: 303-492-8671, Willard 322, and http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices.
(2) Religious Observances Policy
Statement
Campus policy regarding religious
observances requires that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably
and fairly with all students who, because of religious obligations,
have conflicts with scheduled exams, assignments or required
attendance. In this class, students who are absent from a class
due to a religious observance should talk to me about the material that
I covered in that class. If a religious observance conflicts with
the date of the final examination, please inform me of this in writing
as early as possible, so that alternative arrangements can be made.
(3) Classroom Behavior Policy Statement
Students and faculty each
have responsibility for maintaining an appropriate learning
environment. Those who fail to adhere to such behavioral standards may
be subject to discipline. Professional courtesy and sensitivity are
especially important with respect to individuals and topics dealing
with differences of race, culture, religion, politics, sexual
orientation, gender, gender variance, and nationalities. Class
rosters are provided to the instructor with the student's legal name. I
will gladly honor your request to address you by an alternate name or
gender pronoun. Please advise me of this preference early in the
semester so that I may make appropriate changes to my records.
See polices at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/classbehavior.html
and at http://www.colorado.edu/studentaffairs/judicialaffairs/code.html#student_code.
(4) Statement concerning Sexual
Harassment and Amorous Relationships
The University of Colorado
at Boulder policy on Discrimination and Harassment, the University of
Colorado policy on Sexual Harassment and the University of Colorado
policy on Amorous Relationships apply to all students, staff and
faculty. Any student, staff or faculty member who believes s/he
has been the subject of discrimination or harassment based upon race,
color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual
orientation, or veteran status should contact the Office of
Discrimination and Harassment (ODH) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of
Judicial Affairs at 303-492-5550. Information about the ODH, the
above referenced policies and the campus resources available to assist
individuals regarding discrimination or harassment can be obtained at http://www.colorado.edu/odh.
(5) Statement concerning the Boulder Campus Honor Code
All students of the University of Colorado at Boulder are
responsible for knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy
of this institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating,
plagiarism, aid of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery,
and threatening behavior. All incidents of academic misconduct
shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu; 303-725-2273).
Students who are found to be in violation of the academic integrity
policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty
member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to
university probation, suspension, or expulsion). Other information on
the Honor Code can be found at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/honor.html
and at http://www.colorado.edu/academics/honorcode/
.