Syllabus
Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology
Section
001
Professor
Michael Tooley
MWF
1:00-1:50
Office Hours: MWF 12:00-12:50
Hellems 241
Hellems, Room 277
Textbooks
The texts that we will be using
in this course are as follows:
Michael Huemer (ed.), Epistemology
- Contemporary Readings (London and New York: Routledge, 2002.)
Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the
Veil of Perception (New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers, 2001)
Two useful sources of
(generally)
good overview articles for many of the central topics in this course
are
the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards (8
volumes,
plus a 1996 Supplement, edited by Donald M. Borchert; call
number:
B41 .E5), and the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited
by
Edward Craig (10 volumes; call number: B51 .R68). A copy of the
former is available in the Reference room of Norlin Library.
Copies of the latter are stored offsite.)
Another useful source, though
it is still in a
very
incomplete state, as many of the articles have not yet been written, is
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, found online at
http://plato.stanford.edu/
Required Work
The required work for the
course
will consist of the following:
(1) Two essays, of about 1200-1500 words in length. Each
essay will count for one-third of your final grade. The due dates
for the essays are as follows:
First
Essay:
Monday, March 15
Second
Essay:
Friday, April 23
Detailed instructions for the
essays, together with a list of possible topics, can be found online at
http://spot.colorado.edu/~tooley/EssayTopics3340.html.
(2) A two and one-half hour, closed-book, essay-style, final
examination. This will also count for one-third of your final
grade. The final
examination will be on Wednesday, May 5, from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.,
in Hellems 241.
Class Web Site
Course materials can be found
online at the following location:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~tooley/Philosophy3340.html
Format of the Course
Classes will take the form
of lecture/discussion. My goal will be to explain and to motivate
the central concepts and arguments, and to encourage class discussion
of those ideas and arguments.
Students should read the
relevant articles before each class, in order to be able to participate
fully in the class discussions. Such participation will be very
helpful in enabling you to master the material.
Topics and Readings
In the case of some of the
topics,
the readings are divided into "core readings" and "optional
readings".
The core readings will more than suffice, in the case of every topic,
to
give you a very good grasp of the basic issues. If, however, you
have a good background in philosophy, or if you find the core readings
insufficiently challenging, you may well want to go on to do some of
the
optional readings. The latter are generally, though not always,
somewhat
more complicated and difficult, and also, in some cases, rather on the
long side.
I. Introduction: Epistemology and Philosophy
II. The Problem of Analyzing the Concept of Knowledge
Core Readings
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 8, s,Epistemology
-
Contemporary Readings, pp. 435-39.
A. J. Ayer, "Knowing as Having the Right to be Sure,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings, pp. 440-3.
Edmund L. Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 444-6.
Michael Clark, "Knowledge and Grounds: A Comment on Mr. Gettier's
Paper," Epistemology - Contemporary
Readings, pp. 447-9.
Optional Readings
Alvin Goldman, "A Causal Theory of Knowing," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 450-63.
Keith Lehrer and Thomas Paxson, "Knowledge: Undefeated Justified
True Belief," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 464-74.
Robert Nozick, "Knowledge," Epistemology
- Contemporary
Readings, pp. 475-490.
Keith DeRose, "Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 491-505.
III. Skepticism
Core Readings
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 9, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 507-12.
René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 513-23.
G. E. Moore, "Proof of an External World," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 602-5.
G. E. Moore, "Hume's Theory Examined," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 606-10.
Michael Huemer, “The Lure of Radical
Skepticism”, chapter II of
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception, pp. 7-25.
Michael Huemer, “Easy Answers to Skepticism”, chapter III of Skepticism
and the Veil of Perception, pp. 27-49.
Optional Readings
Hilary Putnam, "Brains in a Vat," Epistemology
- Contemporary
Readings, pp. 524-38.
Peter Klein, "Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument
Fails," Epistemology - Contemporary
Readings, pp. 552-74.
Michael Huemer, “Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument,” Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 575-89.
IV. The Justification of Induction
Core Readings
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 6, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 293-7.
David Hume, An excerpt from An Enquiry Concerning Human
Understanding, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 298-310.
Paul Edwards, "Russell's Doubts about Induction," Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 311-19.
Nelson Goodman, "The New Riddle of Induction," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 320-32.
John Foster, "Induction, Explanation, and Natural Necessity,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 333-43.
Optional
Readings
Colin Howson and Peter Urbach, An excerpt from Scientific
Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach," Epistemology
- Contemporary
Readings, pp. 344-51.
David Stove, "Another Attempt to Prove that Induction is Justified:
The Law of Large Numbers," Epistemology
- Contemporary Readings,
pp. 352-68.
V. Theories of Justification: Foundationalism and
Coherentism
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 7, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 369-71.
Sextus Empiricus, "The Five Modes," Epistemology
- Contemporary
Readings, pp. 372-4.
I. T. Oakley, "An Argument for Scepticism Concerning Justified
Beliefs," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 375-86.
Laurence Bonjour, An excerpt from The Structure of Empirical Knowledge,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 387-401.
William Alston, "Has Foundationalism Been Refuted?" Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 402-16.
Susan Haack, "A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 417-31.
VI. Perceptual Knowledge of the External
World
Core Readings
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 1, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 27-31.
Michael Huemer, “Introduction: The Problem of Perceptual Knowledge”,
chapter I of Skepticism and the Veil
of Perception, pp. 1-5.
John Locke, An excerpt from Essay
Concerning Human Understanding,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 32-6.
George Berkeley, An excerpt from Of
the Principles of Human
Knowledge, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 37-45.
David Hume, "Of the Academic or Skeptical Philosophy,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 46-50.
Thomas Reid, An excerpt from Essays
on the Intellectual Powers of
Man, Epistemology -
Contemporary
Readings, pp. 51-63.
Bertrand Russell, An excerpt from The
Problems of Philosophy,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 64-73.
J. L. Austin, An excerpt from Sense
and Sensibilia,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 74-84.
Optional
Reading on Perception
H. P. Grice, "The Causal Theory of Perception," in Perceiving,
Sensing, and Knowing, edited by Robert J. Swartz, (Garden City,
New
York: Anchor Books, 1965), pp. 438-72.
VII. Michael Huemer on Direct Realism
Versus
Indirect Realism
Michael Huemer, “A Version of Direct Realism”, chapter IV of Skepticism
and the Veil of Perception, pp. 51-92.
Michael Huemer, “A Version of Foundationalism”, chapter V of Skepticism
and the Veil of Perception, pp. 93-117.
Michael Huemer, “Objections to Direct Realism”, chapter VI of
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception,
pp. 119-147.
Michael Huemer, “An Objection to Indirect Realism: The Problem of
Spatial Properties”, chapter VII of Skepticism
and the Veil of
Perception, pp. 149-174.
Michael Huemer, “The Direct Realist’s Answer to Skepticism”, chapter
VIII of Skepticism and the Veil of
Perception, pp. 175-196.
VIII. Knowledge of the Past
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 2, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 85-7.
Sydney Shoemaker, "Memory", Encyclopedia
of Philosophy. Vol. 5, pp.
265-74.
Bertrand Russell, "Memory," Epistemology
- Contemporary Readings,
pp. 88-90.
Norman Malcolm, "A Definition of Factual Memory," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 91-103.
John Pollock and Joseph Cruz, "Reasoning and Memory,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 104-112.
Michel Huemer, "The Problem of Memory Knowledge," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 113-23.
IX. A
Priori Knowledge
Core Readings
Michael Huemer, Introduction to Chapter 3, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 125-30.
Plato, An excerpt from Meno, Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 131-41.
Immanuel Kant, An excerpt from The Critique of Pure Reason, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 142-51.
Bertrand Russell, An excerpt from The
Problems of Philosophy,
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 152-65.
A. J. Ayer, "The Elimination of Metaphysics," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 166-75.
W. V. Quine, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 176-93.
Optional Readings
Rudolf Carnap, An excerpt from Philosophical
Foundations of
Physics, Epistemology -
Contemporary Readings, pp. 194-207.
Laurence BonJour, "Appendix: Non-Euclidean Geometry and Relativity,"
Epistemology - Contemporary Readings,
pp. 208-15.
Statements Concerning Various
Matters
The University currently recommends the inclusion in all syllabi of
statements dealing with the following matters:
(1) Students with Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations
because of a disability, please submit to me a letter from Disability
Services in a timely manner so that your needs may be addressed.
Disability Services determines accommodations based on documented
disabilities. Contact: 303-492-8671, Willard 322, and http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices.
(2) Religious Observances Policy
Statement
Campus policy regarding religious
observances requires that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably
and fairly with all students who, because of religious obligations,
have conflicts with scheduled exams, assignments or required
attendance. In this class, students who are absent from a class
due to a religious observance should talk to me about the material that
I covered in that class. If a religious observance conflicts with
the date of the final examination, please inform me of this in writing
as early as possible, so that alternative arrangements can be made.
(3) Classroom Behavior Policy Statement
Students and faculty each
have responsibility for maintaining an appropriate learning
environment. Those who fail to adhere to such behavioral standards may
be subject to discipline. Professional courtesy and sensitivity are
especially important with respect to individuals and topics dealing
with differences of race, culture, religion, politics, sexual
orientation, gender, gender variance, and nationalities. Class
rosters are provided to the instructor with the student's legal name. I
will gladly honor your request to address you by an alternate name or
gender pronoun. Please advise me of this preference early in the
semester so that I may make appropriate changes to my records.
See polices at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/classbehavior.html
and at http://www.colorado.edu/studentaffairs/judicialaffairs/code.html#student_code.
(4) Statement concerning Sexual
Harassment and Amorous Relationships
The University of Colorado
at Boulder policy on Discrimination and Harassment, the University of
Colorado policy on Sexual Harassment and the University of Colorado
policy on Amorous Relationships apply to all students, staff and
faculty. Any student, staff or faculty member who believes s/he
has been the subject of discrimination or harassment based upon race,
color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual
orientation, or veteran status should contact the Office of
Discrimination and Harassment (ODH) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of
Judicial Affairs at 303-492-5550. Information about the ODH, the
above referenced policies and the campus resources available to assist
individuals regarding discrimination or harassment can be obtained at http://www.colorado.edu/odh.
(5) Statement concerning the Boulder Campus Honor Code
All students of the University of Colorado at Boulder are
responsible for knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy
of this institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating,
plagiarism, aid of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery,
and threatening behavior. All incidents of academic misconduct
shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu; 303-725-2273).
Students who are found to be in violation of the academic integrity
policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty
member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to
university probation, suspension, or expulsion). Other information on
the Honor Code can be found at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/honor.html
and at http://www.colorado.edu/academics/honorcode/
.