PHILOSOPHY
1400 (100)
"Philosophy and the
Sciences"
(Fall Semester 2011)
Time: MW 11:00-11:50 AM
Room: HUMN 150
Professor: Carol
Cleland (with TAs Nicholas Casalbore, Spencer Case, Addison Ellis, and Ben Rohrs)
Office: HLMS
282 (EXT 2-7619)
Office
Hours: MW
3-4 pm, F 12-1 pm, & by appointment
Required Books:
Schick,
Readings in the Philosophy of Science.
Collins,
The Language of God.
Selected
Readings on my web page (PHIL 1400, "Additional Materials and Links"):
http://spot.colorado.edu/%7Ecleland/currentCourses.html
Requirements:
1. Reading
Assignments: You are responsible for having read and thought about the assigned material before coming to class. Philosophy is not easy; this process may
take several hours. "Study Questions"
(see above link) will accompany most readings. Their purpose is to help you
learn to read philosophy and to think philosophically. Exams
will be based upon these questions.
2.
Evaluation:
a. 3 Short papers and 3 quizzes:
1.
Short papers: Topics will be
assigned in your section one week before they are due. Short papers should be
2-3 pages long (typed, double-spaced, normal font). They are worth
approximately 30% of your grade.
Paper topics will be assigned on Sept 2 (due Sept 9), Oct 7 (due Oct
14), and Nov. 11 (due Nov. 18).
2. Quizzes:
Administered in your section. They
will consist of one essay question. You will have 25 minutes to answer it. They are worth approximately 30% of your
grade. Quizzes will be given on Sept 23, Oct 28, and Dec 2.
b. Final
Exam or Term Paper option (not
both):
1.Final
Exam: Administered in this room
on Tuesday, Dec. 13 from 7:30-10 PM.
The final exam is designed to be completed in 2 hours and will consist of essay
questions like those on the quizzes. It
is worth approximately 40% of your grade.
2.Term paper: 7-10 pages (normal font, double-spaced,
typed). Topics must be cleared with your TA by Friday, Nov. 18; anyone who fails to do this automatically defaults
to taking the final exam. Final papers are due no latter thanthe end of the
first hour of the final exam. It is worth approximately 40% of your grade.
Note: I do not automatically
give make-up exams or accept late papers. If you believe that you have a good
excuse, talk to your TA before the
assignment is due. After the due date
has passed, you will need a note
from a physician or dean.
c. Borderline
grades: Improvement over
the course of the semester, and regular attendance and participation in
discussion sections will be used to determine grades in borderline cases, which
frequently occur!
Course Description:
The subject of this course is science. Its purpose
is to introduce you to contemporary philosophical thought about the nature of
science in the context of actual examples from science (both historical and
contemporary). We will explore
questions such as the following: What is the "scientific method", and does
it differ from other methods for obtaining knowledge? In what sense can science
be said to make progress? Is scientific knowledge objective? Does observation
provide a truly neutral court of appeal for deciding between competing
scientific hypotheses and theories? Is there a single scientific method for all
of science? Is historical science
(paleontology, etc.) inferior to experimental science? Our investigations will take us through
a number of different fields of science, including physics, astronomy,
chemistry, geology, and biology. We will also explore two contemporary
controversies in depth, one scientific and the other popular, involving
particular scientific disciplines:
(1) What caused the great Permian extinction, which occurred around 250
million years ago (before the age of the dinosaurs) and is thought to have
almost ended life on Earth; (2) Is Darwinian evolution incompatible with belief
in the existence of God? As you
will discover, a number of very famous evolutionary biologists, including Dr.
Collins, the author of one of the books we are reading, are devout Christians
who believe in a personal God. We
will also discuss the related hot button question of whether Darwinian
evolution undermines belief in the existence of objective moral standards.