|
Ethical Theory |
Office hours: Tu
10:30-12 (except M11), F 10-11:30 (except M14, M21, A4), and by appointment |
|
Spring 2008 |
Office: HLMS
164B |
|
Professor Norcross |
Phone: 303 492 7527 Email:
norcross@colorado.edu |
Texts: Contemporary Ethics, William Shaw
Contemporary
Debates in Moral Theory, James Dreier
(ed.)
Course description: This
is a course on ethical theory, with a particular emphasis on the debate between
consequentialism (usually represented by utilitarianism) and deontology. We
will also explore some issues in contemporary metaethics. I
will expect you to attend class fully prepared to discuss the assigned readings
for the week in question.
Requirements (with weight towards final grade): homework
(40%), final paper (50%), class participation (10%). Since class participation
is a requirement for passing the class, and you can't participate unless you
attend, this class has the following
attendance policy: more than five absences, for whatever reason, will result
in failing the course. Since
you never know when you might get sick, it is not a good idea to miss class,
unless you absolutely have to.
Homework: For the twelve weeks starting with Week 3 and ending
with Week 14 you will write a total of ten 450-900 words (approx. 1 1/2-3 pages) reaction pieces to the readings
assigned for that week. The purpose of the assignments is for you to engage the
readings, not to summarize them.
Find something interesting in the readings that you want to talk
about. You might want to take
issue with something you read, to support it, or simply to point out how
interesting or important it is.
Your assignment should be uploaded to your dropbox on the CU Learn site.
Paste the text into the text box. If there is formatting you really don't want
to lose, you can also attach your assignment as a Word document (save it as either
Word 2004 or earlier or as rtf),
but make sure to paste into the text box as well. It should be well-written (complete grammatical sentences,
correct spelling), and carefully proofed. Since the purpose of the homework
assignments is for you to engage the readings before class, and thus be
prepared to discuss the readings in class, your assignment will uploaded to
your dropbox on the CU Learn site before the first class of the relevant week.
If it is uploaded after 12PM on the relevant day, the system will automatically
mark it as late. No assignments will be accepted by the system more than a week
late. I will grade 3 of your 10 assignments (selected at random) out of 10
points, assign a point for each of the other 7 that are completed, and give 1
point for completing 6 or 7 total assignments, 2 points for completing 8 or 9,
and 3 points for completing all 10 (for a maximum possible score of 40).
Completion of fewer than 5 assignments will result in failing the homework part
of the course, and thus, since homework is a requirement, the entire course.
The selection of the 3 to be graded is as follows: 1 from weeks 3-6, 1 from
weeks 7-10, 1 from weeks 11-14. Thus, if you don't complete any assignments
before week 7, you will already have lost 12 points
Suggestions. Do the reading assignments well in advance. You
will probably have to read the text two or three times before you have an
adequate grasp of the material. Philosophy is hard. Don't expect to understand
it all at the first reading. Make use of my office hours to discuss things you
don't understand. Ask questions in class. Very few questions are too silly to
ask.
Disability Accommodations: If you qualify for accommodations because of a
disability please submit a letter to me from Disability Services in a timely
manner so that your needs may be addressed. Disability Services determines
accommodations based on documented disabilities (303-492-8671, Willard 322, http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices).
Religious holidays: If you have to miss a class because of a religious
holiday, plan on using one of your five excused absences.
Honor Code: The honor code applies to every aspect of this class
(including attendance).
Schedule of assignments (subject to change—check frequently). Readings
are from Contemporary Ethics (CE),
Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory
(CD) and online sources as indicated.
|
Dates |
Assignment |
|
Wk 1 (J15-17) |
|
|
Wk 2 (J22-24) |
|
|
Wk 3 (J29-31)
|
CE ch. 1 |
|
Wk 4 (F5-7) |
CE ch. 2 |
|
Wk 5 (F12-14) |
CE ch. 3 |
|
Wk 6 (F19-21) |
CE ch. 4 |
|
Wk 7 (F26-28) |
Alastair Norcross, "Comparing Harms: Headaches
and Human Lives", Philosophy and Public Affairs, Spring 1997 Michael Ridge, "How to Avoid Being Driven to
Consequentialism: A Comment on Norcross", Philosophy and Public
Affairs, Winter 1998 Alastair Norcross, "Speed Limits, Human Lives,
and Convenience: A Reply to Ridge", Philosophy and Public Affairs, Winter 1998 All available online through CU library |
|
Wk 8 (M4-6) |
CD pp. 5-37 |
|
Wk 9 (M11-13) |
CD pp. 38-53 Alastair Norcross, "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation,
Rights, and the Separateness of Persons" (available on CU LEarn) No Class M11 |
|
Wk 10 (M18-20) |
CE ch. 5, No Class either day (but homework still due) |
|
Wk 11 (A1-3) |
CE ch. 8 No Class A3 |
|
Wk 12 (A8-10) |
CD 99-123 |
|
Wk 13 (A15-17) |
CD pp. 129-159 |
|
Wk 14 (A22-24) |
CD pp. 163-196 |
|
Wk 15 (A29-M1) |
CD pp. 201-238 Final paper due A 29
|