Final Report

 

 

Assessing Exposure to Air Toxicants From Environmental Tobacco Smoke

 

 

Shelly L. Miller, Steven Branoff*, Younhee Lim,
Deling Liu
*, Michael D. Van Loy*, and William W Nazaroff*

 

 

*Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

631 Davis Hall

University of California

Berkeley, CA 94720-1710

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Department of Applied Mathematics

Campus Box 427

University of Colorado

Boulder, CO 80309-0427

 

 

 

 

 

Contract Title: Assessing Exposure to Air Toxics from
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (Contract No. 94-344)

Principal Investigator: William W Nazaroff

Prepared for California Air Resources Board
and the California Environmental Protection Agency

Research Division

PO Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

 

 

August 17, 1999

Disclaimer

The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the contractor and not necessarily those of the California Air Resources Board. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such.

 

Abstract

Little is known about the sources or magnitudes of exposure to 243 compounds designated by California legislation as "toxic air contaminants" (TACs). This study estimates the contribution of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to the exposure of nonsmoking Californians for 17 of these compounds known to be emitted from burning tobacco. Two distinct approaches were used in the assessment: (a) measured 24-h personal exposures to selected compounds, such as benzene, were compared for individuals who reported ETS exposure against those who reported no exposure; and (b) information on activity patterns of Californians was combined with estimates of ETS concentrations in indoor environments. The first method was applied for nonsmokers (age Ò 7 y) for the mid-to-late 1980’s. The second method was separately applied for adults, adolescents, and children for both the mid-to-late 1980’s and for the late 1990’s. Averaged over all nonsmoking Californians in the late 1980’s, ETS is estimated to have contributed 5-15 µg h m-3 to daily benzene exposure, corresponding to 2-5% of the total inhalation exposure of nonsmokers. Among those nonsmokers exposed to ETS, average exposure for adolescents was in the range 65-95% of the average for adults; the corresponding range for children was 80-130%. In the late 1990’s, as a result of reduced smoking prevalence among adults and legislation that severely restricts smoking in public buildings, ETS exposures are estimated to be reduced. The fraction of adult nonsmokers exposed to ETS indoors on a given day is predicted to have declined from 52% to 16-19% during the last decade. For adolescents, the corresponding change is from 63% to 33-35%, whereas for children the reduction is from 33% to 21-23% exposed. Among individuals still exposed, the average level of exposure is not predicted to have changed markedly. Using emission factor data, ETS contributions to exposure are estimated for these compounds: acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, 2-butanone, o-cresol, m,p-cresol, ethyl acrylate (upper bound, only), ethylbenzene, formaldehyde, n-nitrosodimethylamine, phenol, styrene, toluene, o-xylene, and m,p-xylene.

 

Executive Summary

Background

In California, Assembly Bills 1807 and 2728 established the objective of assessing and controlling exposure to 243 compounds designated as "toxic air contaminants" (TACs). The California Health and Safety Code Section 39660.5 requires that indoor exposures to candidate toxic air contaminants (TACs) be considered during exposure and risk assessments. In particular, the Air Resources Board (ARB) Indoor Air Quality and Personal Exposure Assessment Program is charged with generating the data necessary for making realistic exposure assessments to indoor pollutants.

For most of these compounds, little information is available on human exposures, and even less on the relative contributions to exposure of sources. The aim of our study was to estimate the contribution of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to the exposure of nonsmoking Californians’ to selected TACs.

Objectives

Five specific objectives were pursued in this project:

(1) Determine the frequency distribution of exposure to selected toxic air contaminants from ETS for the California population.

(2) Determine the proportion of Californians’ total exposure to air toxics that can be attributed to ETS for selected compounds over the period 1984-1990.

(3) Explore the relative amounts of exposure in the workplace and other public spaces versus exposure in residential settings.

(4) Predict the impact of changes in smoking policy and smoking behavior on exposures to ETS-derived toxic air contaminants for the California population for the second half of the 1990s.

(5) Critique the quality of the resulting distributions, taking into account the methodological limitations and the quality of the input data.

Methods

The research was conducted in three phases. In Phase I, the exposure of nonsmoking Californians (age Ò 7 y) was estimated for the mid to late 1980s. Measurements of personal exposure to volatile organic compounds were compared for individuals reporting ETS exposure to those who reported no exposure. The contribution of ETS to personal exposure was determined in this manner separately for four compounds: benzene, styrene, o-xylene, and m,p-xylene. For these species the fractional contribution of ETS to total exposure was computed. Emission factors were then employed to estimate exposure from ETS to thirteen other compounds. In Phase II, exposures were modeled, again for the mid to late 1980s, for adult and adolescent nonsmokers and for children. Here, exposure was computed by combining activity pattern data for the Californian population with concentrations of ETS constituents determined from steady-state material balance models and from published measurements of ETS tracers such as nicotine or particulate matter. Daily exposures were computed by this approach for individuals with different activity patterns and who visited different groups of microenvironments such as residences, workplaces, and restaurants. In Phase III, we estimated exposure for conditions in the late 1990s, using the same methods as in Phase II, but accounting for changes in smoking behavior and for the effects of new statewide restrictions on smoking in public buildings (AB13). In each phase, key uncertainties in the results were quantified.

Results

Environmental tobacco smoke contributes significantly to the exposure of nonsmokers to toxic air contaminants. Among nonsmoking Californians exposed to ETS, the estimated average contribution of ETS was 3-10% of total benzene exposure in the mid to late 1980s (see Table 5.10). For styrene and xylenes, ETS is also a significant contributor to nonsmokers’ exposure, responsible for 6-18% of average styrene exposure, 1-8% of average o-xylene exposure, and 1-5% of average m,p-xylene exposure (again, among nonsmokers exposed to ETS; see Table 5.10). Averaged over all nonsmoking Californians, the corresponding contributions of ETS to total inhalation exposures were 2-5% for benzene, 3-10% for styrene, 0.4-5% for o-xylene, and 1-3% for m,p-xylene (see Table 5.11). For other toxic air contaminants considered in this study – acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, 1,3-butadiene, 2-butanone, o-cresol, m,p-cresol, ethyl acrylate, ethylbenzene, formaldehyde, n-nitrosodimethylamine, phenol, and toluene – the extent of exposure from ETS was quantified (see Tables 5.3-5.5), but total human exposures are unknown. As of the late 1980’s, the most important exposure sites for adults were in one’s own home and in occupational settings, together contributing about 60% to the total ETS exposure (see Figure 5.3). For adolescents and children, residential exposures dominated, contributing roughly half of the total for adolescents and 70-75% of the total for children (see Figures 5.4 and 5.5). Among those nonsmokers exposed to ETS, average exposure for adolescents was in the range 65-95% of the average for adults; the corresponding range for children was 80-130% (see data in Table 5.10). Again, among those exposed, mean daily exposure to benzene from ETS is estimated to have been in the range 9-31 µg h m-3 for adults, 9-20 µg h m-3 for adolescents, and 12-24 µg h m-3 for children, with the ranges being indicative of the uncertainty in the estimates (see Tables 5.3-5.5).

As of the late 1990’s, following implementation of AB13, smoking is no longer permitted in most workplaces in California. Assuming the law is observed, the only significant remaining indoor sites of ETS exposure are in private residences and in vehicles. The prevalence of smoking among adult Californians has also declined during the 1990’s (see Figure 6.1), reducing the frequency and intensity of ETS exposure. These factors are estimated to have substantially reduced the exposure to toxic air contaminants from ETS, primarily by reducing the number of people exposed on a given day. For nonsmoking adults in California, the percentage exposed to ETS on a given day (in microenvironments modeled in this study) is estimated to have declined from 52% in the late 1980’s to 16-19% in the late 1990’s. Corresponding changes for adolescents are from 63% to 33-35% and for children from 33% to 21-23% (see Figure 3.4). The reduction in the mean exposure for all nonsmokers is predicted to be in the range 60-75% for adults, 40-50% for adolescents, and 20-40% for children (see Table 6.8 and Figure 6.10). The proportionally smaller reduction for adolescents and children is predicted because, relative to adults, a larger portion of their exposure occurs in unregulated indoor environments such as private residences. Although the number exposed has declined, average exposure levels for those who remain exposed have not changed markedly, especially for adolescents and children (compare Tables 5.3-5.5 to Tables 6.2-6.4). Among those exposed, mean daily exposure to benzene from ETS in the late 1990s is estimated to be in the range 12-21 µg h m-3 for adults, 9-22 µg h m-3 for adolescents, and 12-28 µg h m-3 for children (see Tables 6.2-6.4). A large portion of the late 1990s exposure is predicted to occur in personal residences, contributing 58-69% of the total exposure for adults, 58-66% for adolescents, and 72-83% for children (see Figures 6.6-6.8). The average daily exposures to 17 toxic air contaminants were estimated for the Californian nonsmoking population, separately for adults, adolescents, and children, for late 1990’s, both for those exposed to ETS on a given day (Tables 6.2-6.4) and for all nonsmokers (Table 6.8). Information on the variability of exposures among individuals is also provided (Figures 6.4 and 6.5).

 

Conclusion

This study quantifies for the first time the role of environmental tobacco smoke in contributing to the exposure of nonsmoking Californian’s to selected toxic air contaminants. Overall, ETS is seen to be a significant, but not dominant source of exposure to benzene, styrene, and xylenes. ETS-caused exposure to other species was quantified, but total inhalation exposures for these species are unknown. Changes in smoking regulations and in smoking behavior during the past decade have reduced by a significant degree the exposure to toxic air contaminants from ETS. However, exposure to ETS in private residences remains a significant means by which Californians encounter toxic air contaminants. The information generated by this research can be used in conjunction with other recently available data to estimate the relative contributions of indoor and outdoor sources of TACs to Californians’ current exposures. This information will help ARB identify effective mitigation strategies for reducing the residual public health risks from these TACs.

The specific compounds considered in this study are all of the formally designated toxic air contaminants for which reliable data exist on ETS emission factors. However, tobacco smoke is known to be a source of other hazardous materials such as particulate matter, metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Exposure to the toxic compounds included in this study is expected to cause only a portion of the total health hazard from ETS.