Office: Hellems
182
Hellems
237
Phone: 492-6964
e-mail: david.boonin@colorado.edu
office hours: TR 11:00-12:30
PHIL
2270: Philosophy and Race
course description: This course offers an introduction to
philosophical thinking about race-related issues via a critical
examination of
writings on five such problems in particular: slave reparations,
affirmative action, racial profiling, hate speech restrictions, and
hate crime
laws. It does not presuppose any
background in philosophy or familiarity with the issues to be
discussed. The format for the course will involve a
combination
of lectures and class discussion. The dates on the syllabus are
approximate and the amount of time spent on any one topic will depend
in part on the amount of class discussion that each topic
generates. If there is time at the end of the semester, we will
briefly discuss a few additional topics selected by the class.
required readings: All required readings are listed below and
are available as electronic texts linked to this syllabus.
Students who wish to access the readings electronically from off-campus
computers will need VPN
software to do so. Students are expected to come to class
having done the required readings, and may benefit from looking at some
of the optional readings listed below as well.
course requirements:
Final grades will be based on a
combination of written work, class participation, quizzes, and a final
examination. Students will be evaluated on their ability to
explain and critique the arguments covered
in the course, and not on whether they agree or disagree with them.
1. papers (60
percent of
final grade): students will write two 8-10 pp. papers, each of which is
worth 30 percent of the final grade. The first paper is due on
Monday, October 12 and the second paper is due on Friday, December
11.
Papers must be submitted as Word documents (preferably as .doc rather
than
.docx documents) through Turnitin.com by 5:00
p.m.
on the day they are due. For information about how to submit a
paper through Turnitin.com, click here.
Students may submit rough drafts for
comments in advance of each deadline (by e-mailing them to me, not via
Turnitin.com), and I will make every reasonable
effort to provide such
feedback in a timely manner, but students do not have the option of
rewriting their paper or doing anything else to earn extra credit after
the papers have been graded. Papers that are submitted late
without
a legitimate excuse will be marked down one half-grade (e.g, from a B
to a B-) for every day that they are late. Be sure to include
your name on the front page of the paper. For further details on
the
writing assingments for this course, click
here .
2. class participation
(20
percent of final grade): participation will count for 20 percent of the
final
grade. Class participation requires, at a minimum, regularly
attending class. In addition, to earn full credit for
participation,
students must be actively engaged in the course, where this is
construed
broadly to include conversations with me during
office
hours, correspondence with me via e-mail and posting to the class
e-mail list, as well as contributions
to
class discussion.
3. final examination
(20
percent of final grade): the final exam will count for 20 percent of
the
final grade. The exam will involve a combination of short answer
questions
and short essay questions and will cover material from the entire
semester, including material from the required readings as well as
information
that was provided in lecture and that arose during class
discussion. Students will be required to answer
short
essay questions about issues other than those they wrote their two
8-10 pp. papers on. The exam will be held on Monday,
Dec. 14, 7:30 - 10:00 p.m,
in Hellems 237..
additional policies: click here
for information on policies
regarding the honor code, classroom environment, disabilities,
religious observances, and discrimination and harassment.
1. introduction and overview (Aug. 25)
2. Slave Reparations (Aug 27 - Sep 17)
2.1 background on
slave reparations
David
Lyons, "The Role of the Federal Government in Slavery and Jim Crow"
(section II) (2004)
2.2 arguments for
slave reparations
Wilton
D. Alston and Walter E. Block, "Reparations, Once Again" (2008)
Robert
Fullinwider, The Case for Reparations" (2000)
Randall
Robinson, "America's Debt
to Blacks" (2000)
Taniecea.Arceneaux, “Reparations
for Slavery: A Cause for Reparations, a Case Against David Horowitz
(2005) (read this after reading Howoritz in 2.3)
Ernest
Allen, Jr. and Robert Chrisman, "Ten Reasons: A Response to David
Horowitz" (2001) (read this after reading Howoritz in 2.3)
2.3 arguments
against slave reparations
David
Horowitz, "Ten Reasons Why
Reparations for Blacks is a Bad Idea for Blacks - and Racist Too" (2001)
Paul
M Hughes, "Rectification and Reparation: What Does Citizen
Responsibility Require?" (2004)
Walter Williams, "The
Legacy of Slavery Hustle" (2001)
Peter
Flaherty and John Carlisle, The Case
Against Slave Reparations (2004)
2.4 further
optional readings on slave
reparations
Stephen
Winter, "Uncertain Justice: History and Reparations" (2006)
Robert
K Fullinwider, "The Reparations Argument: A Reply" (2004)
Chandran
Kukathas, "Who? Whom? Reparations and the Problem of Agency" (2006)
Walter
Block, "On Reparations to Blacks for Slavery" (2002)
3.
affirmative action (Sep 22 - Oct 8)
3.1
background on affirmative action
Robert
Fullinwider, "Affirmative Action" (2001; revised 2005)
3.2arguments for affirmative action
Kenneth
Einar Himma, "Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start
Defense of Affirmative Action" (2001)
Andrew
Valls, "The Libertarian Case for Affirmative Action" (1999)
(Gale)
Joseph LeFevre, "The Value of Diversity: A
Justification of Affirmative Action" (2003) (Wiley InterScience)
Sarah
Stroud, "The Aim of Affirmative Action" (1999)
3.3 arguments against affirmative
action
Lisa
Newton, "Reverse Discrimination as Unjustified" (1973)
Louis
Pojman, "The Case Against Affirmative Action" (1998)
Carl
Cohen, "“Preference
by Race in University Admissions and the
Quest for Diversity" (1998)
Robert
J. Corry, "Affirmative Action: An Innocent Generation's Equalit
Sacrificed" (1996)
3.4 further
optional readings on
affirmative action
Lisa
Newton, "A Fair Defense of a False Start: A Reply to Kenneth Himma"
(2001)
Kenneth
Einar Himma, "It's the Rationale that Counts: A Reply to Newton" (2002)
Mane
Hajdin, "Affirmative Action, Old and New" (2002)
Stephen
Kershnar, "Race as a Factor in University Admissions" (2007)
PAPER #1: due Monday, October 12
4. Racial Profiling (Oct 13 -Nov 3)
4.1
background on racial profiling
Department
of Justice, "Fact Sheet: Racial Profiling" (2003)
Lori Hope,
"Did I Save Lives or Engage in Profiling?"
Kit
R. "A Risky Trip Through 'White
Man's Pass'" (2001)
Heather
Mac Donald, The Myth of Racial Profiling" (2001)
David
Frum, "Support Your Police"
(2003)
4.2 arguments for
racial profiling
John
Derbyshire, "In Defense of Racial Profiling" (2001)
Richard
Lowry, "Profiles in Cowardice"
(2002)
Walter
E. Williams, "Racial Profiling" (2001)
John
H. Fund, "Profiling Encouraged"
(2006)
Charles
Krauthammer. "The Case
for Profiling" (2002)
4.3 arguments
against racial profiling
Kim
Zetter, "Why Racial Profiling Doesn't Work" (2005)
William Anderson
and Gene Callahan, "The Roots of Racial Profiling" (2001)
Jack
Glaser, "The Fallacy of Racial Profiling" (2001)
Tracey
Maclin, "Fourth Amendment on the Freeway," (2001) (read pp. 117-30)
Dinesh
D'Souza, "When Discrimination Makes Sense" (1999)
4.4 optional
further readings on
racial
profiling
Peter
Beinart, "Off-Color" (2002)
James
Forman, Jr. "Arrested
Development" (2001)
Jan
Golab, "Probable Cause" (1999)
Ian
Ayres, "The LAPD and racial profiling" (2008)
Ian
Ayres and Jonathan Borowsky, "A Study of Racially Disparate Outcomes in
the Los Angeles Police Department" (2008)
Harry
G. Levine and Deborah Peterson Small, Marijunana Arrest Crusade (2008)
[Nov. 5: guest presentation - Prof. Chris
Heathwood]
5. hate speech restrictions (Nov 10-19)
5.1 background
on hate speech restrictions
Kevin
Boyle, "Hate Speech -- The United States Versus the Rest of the World?"
(2001)
First
Amendment Center, "Hate Speech and Campus Speech Codes"
5.2 arguments for hate speech restrictions
Richard Delgado, "Words
That Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and
Name-Calling"
(1982) (HeinOnline)
Andrew Altman,
"Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination" (1993)
5.3 arguments
against hate speech restrictions
Nadine
Strossen, "Incitement to Hatred: Should There Be a Limit?" (2001)
Larry
Alexander, "Banning
Hate Speech and the Sticks and Stones
Defense" (1996)
5.4 further
optional readings on hate
speech restrictions
Marjorie
Heins, "Banning Words: A Comment on 'Words that Wound" (1983)
(HeinOnline)
Richard
Delgado, "Professor Delgado Replies [to Marjorie Heins]" (1983)
(HeinOnline)
Philip
N. Cox, "The Disputation of Hate: Speec Does, Pluralism, and Academic
Freedoms" (1995)
Claudia
E. Haupt, "Regulating Hate Speech -- Damned if You Do and Damned if You
Don't" (2005)
6. hate crime laws (Dec 1 - Dec 10)
6.1 background on
hate crime laws
Anti-Defamation
League, "Hate Crime Laws"
6.2 arguments for
hate crime laws
Christopher
Heath Wellman, "A Defense of Stiffer Penalties for Hate
Crimes" (2006)
Amy R.
Baehr, "A Feminist Liberal
Approach to Hate Crime Legislation" (2003)
Steven
M. Freeman, "Hate Crime Laws: Punishment Which Fits the Crime" (1992/3)
(HeinOnline)
Paul
H. Robinson, "Hate Crimes: Crimes of Motive, Character, or Group
Terror?" (1992/3) (HeinOnline)
Kent
Greenawalt, "Reflections on Justifications for Defining Crimes by the
Category of Victim" (1992/3)
6.3 arguments
against hate crime
laws
Heidi
M. Hurd, "Why Liberals Should Hate 'Hate Crime Legislation' " (2001)
David
M. Adams, "Punishing Hate and Achieving Equality" (2005)
Susan
Gellman, "Hate Crime Laws Are Thought Crime Laws" (1992/3) (HeinOnline)
David
Goldberger, "Hate Crime Laws and Their Impact on the First Amendment"
(1992/3) (HeinOnline)
Michael
S. Greve, "Hate Crimes and Hypocrisy" (1992/3) (HeinOnline)
Gregory
R. Nearpass, "The Overlooked Constitutional Objection and Practical
Concerns to Penalty-Enhancement Provisions of Hate Crime
Legislation" (2002) (LegalTrac)
6.4 further
optional readings on hate
crime laws
Claudia Card, "Is Penalty
Enhancement a Sound Idea?" (2001)
Dan M.
Kahan, "Two Liberal
Fallacies in
the Hate Crimes Debate" (2001)
Symposium: "Penalty Enhancement
for Hate Crimes" Criminal Justice
Ethics (1992) (HeinOnline)
Frances
M. Kamm, "Philosophical Inquiry into Penalty Enhancement" (1992/3)
(HeinOnline)
PAPER #2: due
Friday, December 11
FINAL EXAM:
Monday, December 14, 7:30-10:00 pm, in Hellems 237
online resources:
Encyclopedia
of Race and Racism
Race,
Racism, and the Law
Philosopher's
Index
Social
Science Research Network