Media and Civil Society
“The
space of uncoerced human association and also the set of relational networks –
formed for the sake of family, faith, interest, and ideology – that fill this
space” (Michael Walzer).
“A
complex and dynamic ensemble of legally protected non-governmental institutions
that tend to be non-violent, self-organizing… and permanently in tension with
each other and with the state institutions that ‘frame,’ constrict and enable
their activities” (John Keane).
It
is a predominantly Western concept.
A
renaissance in the use of the concept occurred in the 1980s, due to:
This
renewal first emphasized a resurgence in relation to the nation-state, but in
the mid-late 1990s the emphasis has shifted increasingly toward the idea of a global
civil society.
Non-state,
non-market institutions, primarily including:
“The
public character of these societal units allows them to justify and act in open
pursuit of their collective interests in competition with one another. Strong
civil societies are thus synonymous with a high level of ‘institutionalized
social pluralism’” (Philip Oxhorn).
The
mass media (and “new” media) have been the focal point of numerous struggles
against the state and for civic autonomy.
Increasingly,
the emphasis of these struggles has shifted to challenges to market
concentration of privately owned media.
The Internet has become a vital tool of civil society organizations.
Overall,
there is a concern about fetishizing the idea of civil
society.
Civil
Disobedience