Syllabus
PHIL 3100 -- Ethical Theory
Fall 2018
Mondays and Wednesdays, 3:00 - 4:15 p.m.
MCOL W100
Professor
Chris Heathwood
heathwood@colorado.edu
Office: Hellems 192
Hours: Mondays 4:30 - 6:00 p.m., Fridays 8:30 - 10:30 a.m., and by appointment
TA
Julia Uhr
Julia.Uhr@Colorado.EDU
Office: Hellems 15
Hours: Tuesdays, 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.; Thursdays, 12:45 p.m. - 1:45 p.m., and by appointment
Course Description
We make moral and evaluative judgments – e.g., "You shouldn't litter," "It's unfair that some children have no health care," "Friendship helps make life worth living," "Abortion is wrong," "Martin Luther King was a great man" – all the time. But what are we doing when we do this? Are we describing an objective moral reality, or ultimately just expressing our feelings? Are such statements ever true? Can we ever know one to be true? If there are moral facts, are they just a subclass of the natural facts about the world? Assuming that we do have moral obligations, why should we care about them? These are some questions in metaethics, to which the first part of this course will provide an introduction.
Then we will turn to normative ethics, where we attempt to figure out which moral claims – and, in particular, which fundamental moral principles – are actually true. Our main question will be, What makes an act right or wrong? Consequentialists believe that an act's rightness or wrongness is to be explained solely in terms of how good or bad its outcome would be. We will explore this theory in some detail. Deontologists reject the view that how good the consequences would be is all that matters. Some believe that this doesn't matter at all; they believe that we have moral rights, and that our only moral obligations are to avoid violating people's rights. Other deontologists are more moderate and pluralistic: they believe that there are moral reasons for or against a number of different kinds of behavior (some having to do with promoting good consequences, perhaps others having to do with violating rights), and that the correct moral theory requires us to weigh all of the various competing moral considerations. We will explore deontology in some detail as well.
This is a difficult class, especially for those not majoring in philosophy. The prerequisite is two prior courses in philosophy. But more experience than that is recommended. Talk to me about it if you are unsure.
Course Website
The course website, which you should check regularly, can be found here:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/3100FA18/.
Here you will find:
Readings
One book is required:
Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). ISBN: 0230573746.
I ordered about 40 copies through the CU Bookstore. Since this class will turn out to have many more students than that, a good number of you will have to find the book elsewhere. But I will make the first chapter or two from the book available for download so that you can still do our initial reading assignments while you are trying to get a hold of the book.
There will be many additional required readings, which are or will be linked to below on the course schedule. Some of these require a password, which I will give you in class.
Class Mates
So that you will have someone from whom to get the notes and any other pertinent information should you miss class, introduce yourself to two classmates and get their email addresses and phone numbers.
Course Requirements
1. Technology. You must have a colorado.edu email account and regular access to the internet, and you must check your colorado.edu email address and the course website frequently.
Text messaging during class is strictly prohibited. We want this to be an internet-free sanctuary. First-time offenders will be asked to stop; repeat offenders will lose points. When you get to class, please turn your cell phone OFF and put it away.
The use of laptops is also prohibited.* This is because students who use laptops in class do less well in college, as do those who sit near them. (See also: "Why students using laptops learn less in class even when they really are taking notes.") See also this quick slideshow by Andrew Mills at Otterbein University, which has, at the end, links to guides for how to take better notes by hand.
If you simply must communicate with someone from the outside world during class, that's fine; this isn't a prison. But please just leave the room to do so. It is distracting to others (including me) if you are doing stuff on your phone while in class.
(* If you really feel that you will benefit from using a laptop, and you think you can do it in a way that won't be distracting to others, talk to me about it.)
2. Reading Quizzes (20%). There will be quite a few pop quizzes throughout the semester. These quizzes are designed to test that you are doing and understanding the readings, and to give you an incentive never to miss class. For each reading, there will be a set of Reading Questions posted on the website. All of the questions on the pop quizzes will be taken directly from these reading questions. Furthermore, these quizzes are open-note. Thus, as you are doing each reading and taking notes on it, you should write down each question in your notes and then write your answer to it, which you can find by reading, studying, and re-reading the reading. Then bring these notes with you to class. All of the answers to the pop-quiz questions should then be right in your notes! So, yes, there is no reason that you all shouldn't ace all of the reading quizzes.
Note: quizzes are not restricted to readings that were due on the day of the quiz. They might cover readings that were due on earlier days. So always bring all of your past reading notes with you to class.
You are permitted to use notes only that you yourself created from doing the reading; you cannot use or copy a classmate's notes. Though the pop quizzes are open-note, they are not open-book or "open-reading."
Because you might miss a day or two due to illness, I will allow everyone to drop their two lowest quiz scores. This is in lieu of having to get absences excused or allowing make-ups for missed quizzes. So if you miss a quiz due to illness, don't worry about trying to get your absence excused or about asking to do a make-up; instead, you can just drop that score. But don't miss class unless you really are sick (or have some other legitimate reason). If you "use up" your quiz drops frivolously, they'll be gone later in the semester when you really are sick and really need them. (We were motivated to change to this policy by a recent Boulder Faculty Assembly resolution.)
There might be a short homework assignment or two. If so, it will be lumped in with your quiz grades.
3. Two Papers (30%). Two papers are required: a short, pre-structured paper, and a longer, more open-ended paper. The shorter one will be due a third to halfway through the term, the other close to the end of the term. Exact due dates will eventually be posted on the course schedule below. For the shorter paper, we'll give you the topic and the structure for the paper. For the second paper, you will be given a set of topics from which you can choose, or you can come up with your own topic related to the course. Late papers will be penalized 1/3 of a letter grade per day late unless you have a legitimate, documented excuse. I'll say more about the papers later on; in the meantime, you can look at my Philosophy Paper FAQ.
4. Two Exams (50%). There will be two exams: a midterm exam and a non-cumulative final exam. Each exam has two parts, and will take place over two class periods. The first part of each exam will consist of very-short-answer questions (e.g., multiple choice or true/false questions); the second part will consist of short-answer questions (questions that can usually be answered in a sentence to a paragraph or two). For the second part of each exam you'll need to bring a bluebook. Both parts of both exams will take place in class, and will be closed-note and closed-reading.
To help you prepare, a study guide will be made available before each exam. We will also have a review session (during class) before each part of each exam. During these, I take your questions about the study guide or anything else related to exam preparation. You must come prepared for these review sessions by having already written out your own answers to the questions on the study guide.
If you miss any part of any exam during the semester, you will be permitted to take a makeup exam only if you have a legitimate, documented excuse (e.g., non-trivial illness, death in the family, religious obligation). If you need to miss an exam, you need to let both of us know in advance, by email.
Grading
Your final grade for the course is determined according to the following scheme:
Reading Quizzes |
20% | 40 points |
First Paper | 10% | 20 points |
Midterm Exam | 25% | 50 points |
Second Paper | 20% | 40 points |
Final Exam | 25% | 50 points |
TOTAL |
100% | 200 points |
There are no "extra-credit" opportunities. So there's no need to ask if you can "do extra credit" to boost your grade. If you want to get a good grade, don't miss class, arrive on time, do the reading, take notes on readings and in class, ask questions when you have them, contribute to class discussions, start working on your papers early, start working on the study guides for exams well in advance, work on these study guides by actually writing out your answers to the questions on them (as you would have to do if it were a question on the real exam), come to the review sessions having already put a lot of work into the study guides, come to office hours when you are confused about the material, and arrange study groups with your classmates.
We will use a standard "non-curved" grading scale, as follows:
175-179 |
B+ | 155-159 |
C+ | 135-139 |
D+ | ||||
185-200 |
A | 165-174 |
B | 145-154 |
C | 125-134 |
D | 0-119 |
F |
180-184 |
A– | 160-164 |
B– | 140-144 |
C– | 120-124 |
D- |
Course Schedule (continually evolving)
Wk. |
Date | Topic (links below are to lecture slides) |
Readings (due on date listed; subject to change) |
1 |
M 8/26 | Introductions, Syllabus | |
W 8/28 | Our initial views in metaethics | this syllabus | |
2 |
M 9/3 | L A B O R D A Y -- N O C L A S S |
|
W 9/5 | Philosophy, Ethics, Metaethics; |
Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (EI), Introduction (2005) |
|
3 |
M 9/10 | Taxonomy of Metaethical Theories [slides for What is Metaethics?] |
Huemer, EI, §§2.1-2.2; Van Cleve, "Necessity ... " (1999), 15-27 (the rest is optional) |
W 9/12 | Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism; Analytic/Synthetic Distinction; A Priori/Empirical Distinction;Empiricism vs. Rationalism; |
re-read Van Cleve, "Necessity ... " (1999), 15-27; Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" (1936), 102-11; Huemer, EI, §§2.3, 2.8 (2.4-2.7 optional) |
|
4 |
M 9/17 | Why Ayer is a Non-Cognitivist [slides for Non-Cognitivism] Constructivism / Subjectivism / Response-Dependent Theories; Humean Subjectivism |
Hume, excerpts (1740 and 1751); Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 328 (4 lines up) - 332 |
W 9/19 |
Humean Subjectivism; Moore's No-Disagreement Arg.; Other Constructivisms |
Huemer, EI, §§3.1-3.3. Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 333-336. |
|
5 |
M 9/24 | The Arbitrariness Problem [slides for Constructivism] |
Plato, Euthyphro (excerpt) (380 B.C.E). Huemer, EI, §§3.4-3.6. Antony, "Good Minus God" (2011). |
W 9/26 | Reductionism |
Huemer, EI, §4.1. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), 1-5. |
|
6 |
M 10/1 | First Paper Assignment Philosophy Paper FAQ Why Be a Reductionist? |
Huemer, EI, §4.2. Moore, from Principia Ethica (1903), §§5-7, 9-10, and esp. 13. Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" re-read 104-105. |
W 10/3 | The Open Question Argument [slides for Reductionism] |
re-read Moore, from Principia Ethica (1903), §§5-7, 9-10, and esp. 13. re-read Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" re-read 104-105. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), the rest |
|
7 |
M 10/8 | [Combined Handout on Metaethics] Intuitionism and Nihilism Intuitionist Moral Epistemology First Paper Due |
Ross, The Right and the Good (1930), pp. 19-20 (¶¶7-8), pp. 28-34 (¶¶25-27, 29-30, 32-33), pp. 40-41 (¶¶44); Huemer, EI, §§5.1-5.4 |
W 10/10 | Mackie's Arguments Moral Disagreement Study Guide for Midterm [slides for Intuitionism] |
Mackie, "The Subjectivity of Values" (1977) Huemer, EI, §5.5 Huemer, EI, ch. 6 |
|
8 |
M 10/15 | Review for Midterm | Work on Study Guide for Midterm before this review! |
W 10/17 | Midterm Exam, Part 1; then Return Midterm Part 1; More Review | ||
9 |
M 10/22 | Midterm Exam, Part 2 BRING A BLUEBOOK! |
|
W 10/24 | Intro to Normative Ethics [Slides for Intro to NEB] |
||
10 |
M 10/29 | Introducing Act Utilitarianism | Mill, from Utilitarianism (1863) Feldman, "What is Act Utilitarianism?" (1978) |
W 10/31 | Act Utilitarianism |
Feldman, "Act Utilitarianism: Arguments Pro and Con" (1978) | |
11 |
M 11/5 | Return Midterm Exam, Part 2 Finish Act Utilitarianism [slides for Utilitarianism] |
Feldman, "Problems for Act Utilitarianism" (1978) Rachels, "Should We Be Equally Concerned for Everyone?" (2003) |
W 11/7 | Introducing Rights Theory |
Feldman, excerpt explaining context of Nozick passage (2011) Nozick, from Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), 26-33 |
|
12 |
M 11/12 | Rights Theory | Tännsjö, "Moral Rights" (2008) |
W 11/14 | Finish Rights Theory Second Paper Assignment [slides for Rights Theory] |
Locke, some excerpts from his Two Treatises of Government (1690): pp. 106-111 (§4-§14); pp. 30-31 (§42); p. 116 (§26). Philosophy Paper FAQ |
|
M 11/19 - F 11/23: T H A N K S G I V I N G B R E A K |
|||
13 |
M 11/26 | Ross and Prima Facie Duties | Ross, "What Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), 16-31 (thru ¶29), 41-42 (¶45). |
W 11/28 | Rossian Pluralism |
Ross, "What Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), pp. 31-42 (¶¶30- 45): |
|
14 |
M 12/3 | Finish Pluralist Deontology Study Guide for Final Exam |
Hurka, "Pluralist Deontology: Consequentialist Overlaps; Pluralist Deontology: Elaborations" (2014) |
W 12/5 | Second paper due FCQs Impromptu paper presentations [Slides for Rossian Pluralism] |
Sinnott-Armstrong, "How Strong Is This Obligation?" (2009) |
|
15 |
M 12/10 | Review for Final (do study guide in advance) |
|
W 12/12 | Final Exam, Part 1; Return Final Part 1; More Review |
||
Fin |
Tu 12/18 | Final Exam, Part 2: 7:30 p.m., in our room. BRING A BLUEBOOK! |
Accommodations for Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations because of a
disability, please give me a letter from Disability Services
in a timely manner so that your needs can be addressed. For exam accommodations you must provide your letter at least two weeks prior to the exam. Disability
Services determines accommodations based on documented disabilities in the academic environment. Contact
Disability Services at 303-492-8671 or dsinfo@colorado.edu for further assistance. If you have a temporary medical condition or injury, see Temporary Medical Conditions under the Students tab on the Disability Services website.
Classroom Behavior
Students and faculty each have responsibility for maintaining an appropriate learning environment. Those who fail to adhere to such behavioral standards may be subject to discipline. Professional courtesy and sensitivity are especially important with respect to individuals and topics dealing with race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy, age, disability, creed, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, veteran status, political affiliation or political philosophy. Class rosters are provided to the instructor with the student's legal name. I will gladly honor your request to address you by an alternate name or gender pronoun. Please advise me of this preference early in the semester so that I may make appropriate changes to my records. For more information, see the policies on classroom behavior and the Student Code of Conduct.
Honor Code
All students enrolled in a University of Colorado Boulder course are responsible for knowing and adhering to the Honor Code. Violations of the policy may include: plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, lying, bribery, threat, unauthorized access to academic materials, clicker fraud, submitting the same or similar work in more than one course without permission from all course instructors involved, and aiding academic dishonesty. All incidents of academic misconduct will be reported to the Honor Code (honor@colorado.edu); 303-492-5550). Students who are found responsible for violating the academic integrity policy will be subject to nonacademic sanctions from the Honor Code as well as academic sanctions from the faculty member. Additional information regarding the Honor Code academic integrity policy can be found at the Honor Code Office website.
It is the policy of the Philosophy Department that anyone caught violating CU's academic integrity policy (in any way) will automatically receive an F for the entire course. We take cheating very seriously.
CU Boulder is committed to fostering a positive and welcoming learning, working, and living environment. We do not tolerate acts of sexual misconduct (including sexual assault, exploitation, harassment, dating or domestic violence, and stalking), discrimination, and harassment by members of our community. Individuals who believe they have been subject to misconduct or retaliatory actions for reporting a concern should contact the Office of Institutional Equity and Compliance (OIEC) at 303-492-2127 or cureport@colorado.edu. Information about the OIEC, university policies, anonymous reporting, and the campus resources can be found on the OIEC website.
Please know that faculty and instructors have a responsibility to inform OIEC when made aware of incidents of sexual misconduct, discrimination, harassment and/or related retaliation, to ensure that individuals impacted receive information about options for reporting and support resources.
Religious Observances
Campus policy regarding religious observances requires
that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with all students
who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with scheduled exams,
assignments, or required attendance. Please let me know well in
advance about any such conflicts, and we'll work together to resolve them. See campus policy regarding religious observances for full details.