Syllabus
PHIL 3100 -- Ethical Theory
Fall 2019
Section 001: MW 3-4:15p, MUEN E431
Section 002: MW 4:30-5:45p, HLMS 141
Professor
Chris Heathwood
heathwood@colorado.edu
Office: Hellems 192
Hours: Th 2-5p, and
by appointment
TA
Megan Kitts
Megan.Kitts@colorado.edu
Office: Hellems 15
Hours: W 12-2, and
by appointment
Course
Description
We make moral and evaluative judgments – e.g., "You shouldn't
litter," "It's unfair that some children have no health care,"
"Friendship helps make life worth living," "Abortion is wrong,"
"Martin Luther King was a great man" – all the time. But
what are we doing when we do this? Are we describing an
objective moral reality, or ultimately just expressing our
feelings? Are such statements ever true? Can we ever
know one to be true? If there are moral facts, are they
just a subclass of the natural facts about the world?
Assuming that we do have moral obligations, why should we care
about them? These are some questions in metaethics,
to which the first part of this course will provide an
introduction.
Then we will turn to normative ethics, where we attempt to figure out which moral claims – and, in particular, which fundamental moral principles – are actually true. Our main question will be, What makes an act right or wrong? Consequentialists believe that an act's rightness or wrongness is to be explained solely in terms of how good or bad its outcome would be. We will explore this theory in some detail. Deontologists reject the view that how good the consequences would be is all that matters. Some believe that this doesn't matter at all; they believe that we have moral rights, and that our only moral obligations are to avoid violating people's rights. Other deontologists are more moderate and pluralistic: they believe that there are moral reasons for or against a number of different kinds of behavior (some having to do with promoting good consequences, perhaps others having to do with violating rights), and that the correct moral theory requires us to weigh all of the various competing moral considerations. We will explore deontology in some detail as well.
This is a difficult class, especially for those not majoring in
philosophy. The prerequisite is two prior courses in
philosophy. But more experience than that is
recommended. Talk to me about it if you are unsure.
Course Website
The course website, which you should check regularly, can be
found here:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/3100FA19/.
Here you will find:
Readings
One book is required:
Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). ISBN: 0230573746.
You should be able to find it in the CU Bookstore. I will make the first chapter from the book available for download so that you can do our first reading assignment while you are trying to get a hold of the book.
There will be many additional required readings, which are or
will be linked to below on the course schedule. Some of
these require a password, which I will give you in class.
Class Mates
So that you will have someone from whom to get the notes and
any other pertinent information should you miss class,
introduce yourself to two classmates and get their email
addresses and phone numbers.
Course
Requirements
1. Technology. You must have a
colorado.edu email account and regular access to the internet,
and you must check your colorado.edu email address and the
course website frequently.
Text messaging during class is strictly prohibited.
We want this class to be an internet-free sanctuary.
First-time offenders will be asked to stop; repeat offenders
will lose points or worse. When you get to class, please
turn your cell phone OFF and put it away.
The use of laptops is also prohibited.* This is because students who use laptops in class do less well in college, as do those who sit near them. (See also: "Why students using laptops learn less in class even when they really are taking notes.") See also this quick slideshow by Andrew Mills at Otterbein University, which has, at the end, links to guides for how to take better notes by hand.
If you simply must communicate with someone from the outside world during class, that's fine; this isn't prison. But please just leave the room to do so. It is distracting to others (including me) if you are doing stuff on your phone while in class.
(* If you really feel that you will benefit from using a
laptop, and you think you can do it in a way that won't be
distracting to others, talk to me about it. Also of course
tell me if you have a disability that using a laptop helps with;
you can certainly use a laptop in that case.)
2. Reading Quizzes (20%). There will be quite a few pop quizzes throughout the semester. These quizzes are designed to test that you are doing and understanding the readings, and to give you an incentive never to miss class. For each reading, there will be a set of Reading Questions posted on the website. All of the questions on the pop quizzes will be taken directly from these reading questions. Furthermore, these quizzes are open-note. Thus, as you are doing each reading and taking notes on it, you should write down each question in your notes and then write your answer to it, which you can find by reading, studying, and re-reading the reading. Then bring these notes with you to class. All of the answers to the pop-quiz questions should then be right in your notes! So, yes, there is no reason that you all shouldn't ace all of the reading quizzes.
Note: quizzes are not restricted to readings that were due on the day of the quiz. They might cover readings that were due on earlier days. So always bring all of your past reading notes with you to class.
You are permitted to use only those notes that you yourself created from doing the reading; you cannot use or copy a classmate's notes. Though the pop quizzes are open-note, they are not open-book or "open-reading."
Because you might miss a day or two due to illness, we will allow everyone to drop their two lowest quiz scores. This is in lieu of having to get absences excused or allowing make-ups for missed quizzes. So if you miss a quiz due to illness, don't worry about trying to get your absence excused or about asking to do a make-up; instead, you can just drop that score. But don't miss class unless you really are sick (or have some other legitimate reason). If you "use up" your quiz drops frivolously, they'll be gone later in the semester when you really are sick and really need them.
There might be a short homework assignment or two. If so, it will be lumped in with your quiz grades.
3. Two Papers (30%). Two papers are required: a short, pre-structured paper, and a longer, more open-ended paper. The shorter one will be due about a third to a half of the way through the term, the other close to the end of the term. Exact due dates will eventually be posted on the course schedule below. For the shorter paper, we'll give you the topic and the structure for the paper. For the second paper, you will be given a set of topics from which you can choose, or you can come up with your own topic related to the course. Late papers will be penalized 1/3 of a letter grade per day late unless you have a legitimate, documented excuse. I'll say more about the papers later on; in the meantime, you can look at my Philosophy Paper FAQ.
4. Two Exams (50%). There will be two exams: a midterm exam and a non-cumulative final exam. Each exam has two parts, and will take place over two class periods. The first part of each exam will consist of very-short-answer questions (e.g., multiple choice or true/false questions); the second part will consist of short-answer questions (questions that can usually be answered in a sentence to a paragraph or two). For the second part of each exam you'll need to bring a bluebook. Both parts of both exams will take place in class, and will be closed-note and closed-reading.
To help you prepare, a study guide will be made available before each exam. We will also have a review session (during class) before each part of each exam. During these, I take your questions about the study guide or anything else related to exam preparation. You must come prepared for these review sessions by having already written out your own answers to the questions on the study guide.
If you miss any part of any exam during the semester, you will be permitted to take a makeup exam only if you have a legitimate, documented excuse (e.g., non-trivial illness, death in the family, religious obligation). If you need to miss an exam, you need to let both of us know in advance, by email.
Grading
Your final grade for the course is determined according to the
following scheme:
Reading
Quizzes |
20% | 40 points |
First Paper | 10% | 20 points |
Midterm Exam | 25% | 50 points |
Second Paper | 20% | 40 points |
Final Exam | 25% | 50 points |
TOTAL |
100% | 200
points |
There are no "extra-credit" opportunities. So there's no need to ask if you can "do extra credit" to boost your grade. If you want to get a good grade, don't miss class, arrive on time, do the reading, take notes on readings and in class, ask questions when you have them, contribute to class discussions, start working on your papers early, start working on the study guides for exams well in advance, work on these study guides by actually writing out your answers to the questions on them (as you would have to do if it were a question on the real exam), come to the review sessions having already put a lot of work into the study guides, come to office hours when you are confused about the material, and arrange study groups with your classmates.
We will use a standard
"non-curved" grading scale, as follows:
175-179
|
B+ |
155-159
|
C+ |
135-139
|
D+ | ||||
185-200
|
A |
165-174
|
B |
145-154
|
C |
125-134
|
D |
0-119
|
F |
180-184
|
A– |
160-164
|
B– |
140-144
|
C– |
120-124
|
D- |
Course Schedule (continually evolving)
Wk.
|
Date | Topic (links below are to lecture slides) |
Readings (due on date listed; subject to change) |
1
|
M 8/26 | Introductions, Syllabus | |
W 8/28 | Our initial views in metaethics | this syllabus | |
2
|
M 9/2 |
L A B O R D A
Y -- N
O C L A S S
|
|
|
W 9/4 | Philosophy, Ethics, Metaethics; |
Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (EI),
Introduction
(2005) |
3
|
M 9/9 | Taxonomy of Metaethical Theories [slides for What is Metaethics?] |
Huemer, EI, §§2.1-2.2; Van Cleve, "Necessity ... " (1999), 15-27 (the rest is optional) |
|
W 9/11 | Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism;
Analytic/Synthetic Distinction; A Priori/Empirical Distinction; |
Ayer, "Critique
of Ethics and Theology" (1936), 102-11; Huemer, EI, §§2.3, 2.8 (2.4-2.7 optional) |
4
|
M 9/16 | Empiricism
vs. Rationalism Why Ayer is a Non-Cognitivist [slides for Non-Cognitivism] |
Hume, excerpts
(1740 and 1751); Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 328 (4 lines up) - 332 |
|
W 9/18 |
Constructivism
/ Subjectivism / Response-Dependent Theories; Humean Subjectivism; Moore's No-Disagreement Arg.; Other Constructivisms |
Huemer,
EI, §§3.1-3.3. Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 333-336. |
5
|
M 9/23 | Moore's
No-Disagreement Arg.; Other Constructivisms |
Re-read Moore, "The
Nature of Moral Philosophy"
(1922), 333-336 |
|
W 9/25 | Finish Moore's
No-Dis. Arg. The Arbitrariness Problem |
Plato, Euthyphro
(excerpt) (380 B.C.E). Huemer, EI, §§3.4-3.6. Antony, "Good Minus God" (2011). |
6
|
M 9/30 | Finish Arbitrariness
Problem [slides for Constructivism] Reductionism First Paper Assignment Philosophy Paper FAQ |
Huemer, EI,
§4.1. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), 1-5. |
|
W 10/2 | Reductionism |
Huemer, EI,
§4.2 Moore, from Principia Ethica (1903), §§5-7, 9-10, and esp. 13. Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" re-read 104-105. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), the rest |
7
|
M 10/7 | The Open-Question Argument [slides for Reductionism] First Paper Due |
|
|
W 10/9 | [Combined
Handout on Metaethics] Intuitionism and Nihilism Intuitionist Moral Epistemology Mackie's Arguments Moral Disagreement [slides for Intuitionism and Nihilism] Study Guide for Midterm |
Ross, The
Right and the Good (1930), pp. 19-20
(¶¶7-8), pp. 28-34 (¶¶25-27, 29-30, 32-33), pp.
40-41 (¶¶44); Huemer, EI, §§5.1-5.4 Mackie, "The Subjectivity of Values" (1977) Huemer, EI, §5.5 Huemer, EI, ch. 6 |
8
|
M 10/14 | Review for Midterm | Work on Study Guide for Midterm before this review! |
|
W 10/16 | Midterm Exam, Part
1; then Return Midterm Part 1; More Review, if
time allows.. |
|
9
|
M 10/21 | Midterm Exam, Part 2 BRING
A BLUEBOOK! |
|
|
W 10/23 | Intro to Normative Ethics [Slides for Intro to NEB] |
|
10
|
M 10/28 | Introducing Act Utilitarianism | Mill, from
Utilitarianism (1863) Feldman, "What is Act Utilitarianism?" (1978) |
|
W 10/30 | Act Utilitarianism Stated |
Feldman, "Act Utilitarianism: Arguments Pro and Con" (1978) |
11
|
M 11/4 | Problems for Act Utilitarianism [slides for Utilitarianism] |
Feldman, "Problems
for Act Utilitarianism" (1978) Rachels, "Should We Be Equally Concerned for Everyone?" (2003) |
|
W 11/6 | Introducing Rights Theory |
Feldman, excerpt
explaining context of Nozick passage (2011) Nozick, from Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), 26-33 |
12
|
M 11/11 | Nozickian Rights Theory | Tännsjö, "Moral Rights"
(2008) |
|
W 11/13 | Finish Rights Theory [slides for Rights Theory] |
Locke, some excerpts from his Two Treatises of
Government (1690): pp. 106-111 (§4-§14);
pp. 30-31 (§42); p. 116 (§26). Philosophy Paper FAQ |
13
|
M 11/18 | Ross and Prima Facie Duties Second Paper Assignment |
Ross, "What
Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), 16-31
(thru ¶29), 41-42 (¶45). |
|
W 11/20 | Rossian Pluralism |
Ross, "What
Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), pp. 31-42 (¶¶30-
45): |
M 11/25 - F 11/29: T H A N K S G I V I N G B R E A K | |||
14
|
M 12/2 | Finish Pluralist
Deontology |
Hurka, "Pluralist
Deontology: Consequentialist Overlaps; Pluralist
Deontology: Elaborations" (2014) |
W 12/4 | Second paper
due FCQs Impromptu paper presentations [Slides for Rossian Pluralism] Study Guide for Final Exam |
(no new readings due) |
|
15
|
M 12/9 | Review for Final (do
study guide in advance) |
|
|
W 12/11 | Final Exam, Part 1;
Return Final Part 1; More Review |
|
Fin
|
Final Exam, Part 2:
For section 001: WED DEC 18, 7:30 p.m., MUEN E431. BRING A BLUEBOOK! For section 002: TUE DEC 17, 7:30 p.m., HLMS 141. BRING A BLUEBOOK! |
Accommodations for Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations because
of a disability, please submit your accommodation letter from
Disability Services to your faculty member in a timely manner so
that your needs can be addressed. Disability Services
determines accommodations based on documented disabilities in
the academic environment. Information on requesting
accommodations is located on the Disability
Services website. Contact Disability Services at
303-492-8671 or dsinfo@colorado.edu
for further assistance. If you have a temporary medical
condition or injury, see Temporary
Medical Conditions under the Students tab on the
Disability Services website.
Classroom Behavior
Students and faculty each have responsibility for
maintaining an appropriate learning environment. Those who
fail to adhere to such behavioral standards may be subject to
discipline. Professional courtesy and sensitivity are
especially important with respect to individuals and topics
dealing with race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy,
age, disability, creed, religion, sexual orientation, gender
identity, gender expression, veteran status, political
affiliation or political philosophy. Class rosters are
provided to the instructor with the student's legal name. I
will gladly honor your request to address you by an alternate
name or gender pronoun. Please advise me of this preference
early in the semester so that I may make appropriate changes
to my records. For more information, see the policies on
classroom
behavior and the Student Code of
Conduct.
Honor Code
All students enrolled in a University of Colorado
Boulder course are responsible for knowing and adhering
to the Honor Code. Violations of the policy may
include: plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, lying, bribery,
threat, unauthorized access to academic materials, clicker
fraud, submitting the same or similar work in more than one
course without permission from all course instructors involved,
and aiding academic dishonesty. All incidents of academic
misconduct will be reported to the Honor Code (honor@colorado.edu); 303-492-5550).
Students who are found responsible for violating the academic
integrity policy will be subject to nonacademic sanctions from
the Honor Code as well as academic sanctions from the faculty
member. Additional information regarding the Honor Code academic
integrity policy can be found at the Honor Code Office website.
It is the policy of the Philosophy Department that anyone caught violating CU's Honor Code (in any way) will automatically receive an F for the entire course. We take cheating very seriously.
The University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) is
committed to fostering a positive and welcoming learning,
working, and living environment. CU Boulder will not tolerate
acts of sexual misconduct, intimate partner abuse (including
dating or domestic violence), stalking, protected-class
discrimination or harassment by members of our community.
Individuals who believe they have been subject to misconduct or
retaliatory actions for reporting a concern should contact the
Office of Institutional Equity and Compliance (OIEC) at
303-492-2127 or cureport@colorado.edu. Information about the
OIEC, university policies, anonymous
reporting, and the campus resources can be found on the OIEC
website.
Please know that faculty and instructors have a responsibility to inform OIEC when made aware of incidents of sexual misconduct, discrimination, harassment and/or related retaliation, to ensure that individuals impacted receive information about options for reporting and support resources.
Religious Holidays
Campus policy regarding religious observances requires that
faculty make every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with
all students who, because of religious obligations, have
conflicts with scheduled exams, assignments or required
attendance. Please
let us know well in advance about any such conflicts, and
we'll work together to resolve them. See the campus
policy regarding religious observances for full
details.