PHIL 6100 Seminar in Ethics: Topics in
Well-Being
Fall 2021
Prof. Chris Heathwood
University of Colorado Boulder
What We Did Each Day
(or plan to do)
WEEK 1 Th
8/26:
WEEK 2 Th 9/2:
WEEK 3 Th 9/9:
Loose ends from last time:
Quibble with Fletcher Formulation of DFT
Gabe's Question
Some thoughts on objection based on a case of
conflicting desires
- dispositional vs. occurrent
desires
- how a version of DFT that appeals
to dispositional desires may avoid the objection
- how
a version of DFT that appeals to occurrent desires may
still face the objection
- a reply to the objection on
behalf of this theory
Brief Recap of Fletcher Chapter on Objective List Theory
Conceptual
Clarifications (Austin)
- prudential value vs. value
simpliciter vs. moral value
- basic vs. derivative value
- a Mackian objection to OLT (Richard)
On the Explanatory Objection to OLT (Kira)
OLT too rigid? (Jenn)
A More Flexible OLT? (Brita)
An Explanatory Challenge for this View
WEEK 4 Th 9/16:
1. A
meta-issue: when good states doing bad things (Brita)
2. Happiness Theory
- Recap of Happiness chapter
- An objection to Fletcher on
HTWB+LSH2 (Gabe)
- More on HTWB+LSH2
- Changing Assessments (Jenn, Bo)
3. Hybrid Theory
- Recap of Hybrid Theory Chapter
- Why go hybrid?
- Taking Stock of
all our theories (Corey)
- A
taxonomy of well-being theories
WEEK 5 Th 9/23:
1. Background on the Resonance Constraint (RC)
- Railton passage
- Resonance Constraint
supposed to rule out OLT
- How
to argue for RC
- Is RC
Question Begging?
- RC
relevant to the "Euthyphro Question" about Well-Being
2. Fletcher and Hawkins
-
Various Forms of Internalism
-
Fletcher's Aims in the Appendix
-
Fletcher's suggestion that violating RC is to hold "that an
agents engagement is completely irrelevant to their
well-being
- AD1:
x is good for S at t only if S desires x at t.
- Cf. Hawkins's SC
- Fletcher's Objection to AD1: Negative Norman
- A problem for this objection to do with 'is good' vs. 'would
be good'
- A related view that does have implications about 'would be
good':
AD1*: x
would be good for S at t if x were to obtain at t only if S
desire would desire x at t if x were to obtain at t.
- What if Norman wouldn't desire self-respect or happiness if
he got it?
- The
idea that merely possible goods provide actual reasons and the
"complacency pill" objection to this
WEEK 6 Th 9/30:
WEEK 7 Th 10/7:
WEEK 8 Th 10/14:
WEEK 9 Th 10/21:
WEEK 10 Th 10/28:
WEEK 11 Th 11/4:
WEEK 12 Th 11/11:
WEEK 13 Th 11/18:
In-House Conference on Well-Being
WEEK 14 Th 12/2:
In-House Conference on Well-Being
WEEK 15 Th 12/9:
In-House Conference on
Well-Being