To study for Exam #3, write out answers 
    the following questions.  Be sure to answer the questions completely 
    -- don't assume that the reader knows anything about the topic; don't assume 
    that the reader already knows the details of the thought experiments that 
    are used in the arguments.
     
1. (a) What is the Fundamental Question in the Abortion 
  Debate? 
      (b) What is the problem with putting the question in 
  the following way: "Is abortion morally permissible?"?
2. (a) What is Noonan's Main Thesis?
      (b) Present Noonan's Main Argument for this thesis (the 
  one featuring The Injury Principle).  (No need to "Explain" this 
  argument.)
      (c) Evaluate this argument.
3. (a) What is the fallacy of equivocation?  What exactly 
  is defective about arguments that commit the fallacy of equivocation?
      (b) Present the Third Anti-Abortion Argument (featuring 
  "The Killing-the-Innocent Principle").
      (c) The Third Anti-Abortion Argument commits the fallacy 
  of equivocation.  On what word does the argument equivocate?  Explain 
  the two meanings of this word.  
      (d) Evaluate the Third Anti-Abortion Argument.
4. (a) Which 
  premise of the Third Anti-Abortion Argument (premise 1 or premise 2) does Thomson 
  concede for the sake of argument?
      (b) Present, Explain, and Evaluate  
  The Famous Violinist Argument against The Killing-the-Innocent Principle.
5. (a) What is Thomson's Position 
  on Abortion?
      (b) Do you think using highly reliable birth control 
  amounts to taking all reasonable 
  precautions against having a child?  Or do you 
  think more (such as abstinence) is required? Suppose abstinence is required; 
  how does this make trouble for Thomson's defense of abortion?
6. (a) What is the Desire Theory of Killing (DTK)?  
  Give some reasons to think it is not true.
      (b) What is the 
  Future-Like-Ours Theory of Killing (FLOTK)?
      (c) What 
  does FLOTK imply about euthanasia? Do you think FLOTK has the correct implication 
  here?
      (d) What 
  does FLOTK imply about killing babies so young that 
  they are not yet persons (in the psychological sense)? Do 
  you think FLOTK has the correct implication here?
      (d) What 
  does FLOTK imply about abortion? Do you think FLOTK has the correct implication 
  here?  Explain.