Syllabus
PHIL 3100 -- Ethical Theory
Fall 2015
MWF 1:00-1:50
Hellems 229
Professor
Chris Heathwood
heathwood@colorado.edu
Office: Hellems 192
Hours: Wednesdays 2:30-4:30, and by appointment
Course Description
We make moral and evaluative judgments – e.g., "You shouldn't litter," "It's unfair that some children have no health care," "Friendship helps make life worth living," "Abortion is wrong," "Martin Luther King was a great man" – all the time. But what are we doing when we do this? Are we describing an objective moral reality, or ultimately just expressing our feelings? Are such statements ever true? Can we ever know one to be true? If there are moral facts, are they just a subclass of the natural facts about the world? Assuming that we do have moral obligations, why should we care about them? These are some questions in metaethics, to which the first part of this course will provide an introduction.
Then we will turn to normative ethics, where we attempt to figure out which moral claims – and, in particular, which fundamental moral principles – are actually true. Our main questions will be, What makes an act right or wrong?, and, What makes a state of affairs good or bad? Consequentialists believe that an act's rightness or wrongness is to be explained solely in terms of how good or bad its outcome would be. We will explore this theory, as well as theories about what makes an outcome good or bad (and especially about what makes an outcome good or bad for someone). Deontologists reject the view that consequences are all that matter. They typically believe that we have special obligations (e.g., to our children, to people with whom we have made agreements) that are not explained by the value of outcomes, and that there are constraints against certain kinds of behavior (e.g., lying, harming the innocent) even when doing so would lead to the best outcome. We will explore deontology as well.
This is a difficult class, especially for those not majoring in philosophy (but even for those who are). You must have taken at least two courses in philosophy at the university level to be eligible to take this course. But more experience than that is recommended. Talk to me about it if you are unsure.
Course Website
The course website, which you should check regularly, can be found here:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/phil3100/.
Here you will find:
Readings
One book is required:
Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). ISBN: 0230573746.
I ordered it at the CU Bookstore. There will be many additional required readings, which are or will be linked to below on the course schedule. Some of these require a password, which I will give you in class.
Class Mates
So that you will have someone from whom to get the notes and any other pertinent information should you miss class, introduce yourself to two classmates and get their email addresses and phone numbers.
Course Requirements
1. Technology. You must have an email account and regular access to the internet, and you must check your colorado.edu email address and the course website frequently.
Text messaging during class is strictly prohibited. First-time offenders will be asked to stop; repeat offenders will lose points. When you get to class, please turn your cell phone OFF and put it away.
The use of laptops is also prohibited. This is because students who use laptops in class do less well in college, as do those who sit near them. (See also: "Why students using laptops learn less in class even when they really are taking notes" and "Attention, Students: Put Your Laptops Away.")
If you simply must communicate with someone from the outside world during class, that's fine; please just leave the room to do so.
2. Reading Quizzes (20%). There will be quite a few "pop" quizzes throughout the semester. These quizzes are designed to test that you are doing and understanding the readings, and to give you an incentive never to miss class (the quizzes are unannounced). For each reading, there will be a set of Reading Questions posted on the website. All of the questions on the pop quizzes will be taken directly from these reading questions. Furthermore, these quizzes are open-note. Thus, as you are doing each reading and taking notes on it, you should copy down each question in your notes and then write your answer to it, which you can find by studying the reading. Then bring these notes with you to class. All of the answers to the pop-quiz questions should then be right in your notes! So, yes, there is no reason that you all shouldn't ace all of the reading quizzes.
You are permitted to use notes only that you yourself created from doing the reading; you cannot use or copy a classmate's notes. Though the pop quizzes are open-note, they are not open-book or "open-reading."
Quizzes are not restricted to readings that were due on the day of the quiz. They might cover readings that were due on earlier days.
There might be a couple of short homework assignments. If there are, they will be lumped in with your quiz grades.
3. Two Papers (40%). Two papers are required. One will be due a third to a halfway through the term, the other close to the end of the term. Exact due dates will be posted on the course schedule below. For each paper, you will be given a set of paper topics. You can choose one of those, or you can come up with your own topic. Late papers will be penalized 1/3 of a letter grade per day late unless you have a legitimate, documented excuse. I'll say more about the papers later on; in the meantime, you can look at my Philosophy Paper FAQ.
4. Two Exams (40%). There will be two exams: a midterm exam and a non-cumulative final exam. Each exam has two parts, and will take place over two class periods. The first part of each exam will consist of very-short-answer questions (e.g., multiple choice or true/false questions); the second part will consist of short-answer questions (questions that can usually be answered in a sentence to a paragraph). For the second part of each exam you'll need to bring a bluebook. Both parts of both exams will take place in class, and will be closed-note and closed-reading.
To help you prepare, a study guide will be made available before each exam. We will also have a review session (during class) before each part of each exam. During these, I take your questions about the study guide or anything else related to exam preparation. You must come prepared for these review sessions by having already written out your own answers to the questions on the study guide.
If you miss any part of any exam during the semester, you will be permitted to take a makeup exam only if you have a legitimate, documented excuse (e.g., non-trivial illness, death in the family, religious obligation). If you need to miss an exam, you need to let me know in advance, by email.
Grading
Your final grade for the course is determined according to the following scheme:
Reading Quizzes |
20% | 100 points |
First Paper | 20% | 100 points |
Midterm Exam | 20% | 100 points |
Second Paper | 20% | 100 points |
Final Exam | 20% | 100 points |
TOTAL |
100% | 500 points |
There are no "extra-credit" opportunities. So there's no need to ask if you can "do extra credit" to boost your grade. If you want to get a good grade, don't miss class, arrive on time, do the reading, take notes on readings and in class, ask questions when you have them, contribute to class discussions, start working on your papers early, start working on the study guides for exams well in advance, work on these study guides by actually writing out your answers to the questions on them (as you would have to do if it were a question on the real exam), come to the review sessions having already put a lot of work into the study guides, come to office hours when you are confused about the material, and arrange study groups with your classmates.
We will use a standard "non-curved" grading scale, as follows:
438-449 |
B+ | 388-399 |
C+ | 338-349 |
D+ | ||||
463-500 |
A | 413-437 |
B | 363-387 |
C | 313-337 |
D | 0-299 |
F |
450-462 |
A– | 400-412 |
B– | 350-362 |
C– | 300-312 |
D- |
Course Schedule (continually evolving)
Wk. |
Date | Topic (links below are to lecture slides) |
Readings (due on date listed; subject to change) |
1 |
M 8/24 | Introductions, Syllabus | |
W 8/26 | Finish Administrative Stuff Our initial views in metaethics |
this syllabus | |
F 8/28 | Our initial views in metaethics |
|
|
2 |
M 8/31 | Philosophy, Ethics, Metaethics; Taxonomy of Metaethical Theories |
Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (EI), Introduction (2005) |
W 9/2 | Finish Metaethical Taxonomy [slides for What is Metaethics?] |
Huemer, EI, §§2.1-2.2 |
|
F 9/4 | Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism; Arg. from MJI against Cognitivism |
OPTIONAL: Smith, "What is the Moral Problem?" (1994); REQUIRED: Van Cleve, "Necessity ... " (1999), 15-27 (the rest is optional) |
|
3 |
M 9/7 | NO CLASS -- LABOR DAY | |
W 9/9 | Arg. from MJI against Cognitivism |
Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" (1936), 102-113 Huemer, EI, §§2.3, 2.8 (2.4-2.7 optional). |
|
F 9/11 | Analytic/Synthetic Distinction; A Priori/Empirical Distinction; Empiricism vs. Rationalism |
Hume, excerpts (1740 and 1751) | |
4 |
M 9/14 |
Why Ayer is a Non-Cognitivist; [slides for Non-Cognitivism] |
Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 329-332. |
W 9/16 | Constructivism / Subjectivism; Humean Subjectivism; |
Huemer, EI, §§3.1-3.3. Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy" (1922), 333-336. |
|
F 9/18 | Moore's No-Disagreement Arg.; Divine Command Theory; Ideal Observer Theory |
re-read Moore, "The Nature of Moral Philosophy," 333-336. | |
5 |
M 9/21 | Kantian Constructivism (Guest Class by Bodhi Melnitzer) |
Korsgaard, "Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy" (2003), §§1-2, 5-7 (rest optional). |
W 9/23 | Moore's No-Disagreement Arg. and other Constructivisms; The Arbitrariness Problem |
Plato, Euthyphro (excerpt) (380 B.C.E). Huemer, EI, §§3.4-3.6. Antony, "Good Minus God" (2011). |
|
F 9/25 | The Arbitrariness Problem [slides for Constructivism] |
re-read Huemer p. 50 last ¶, p. 52 last full ¶ and ¶ after that, p. 57 from 'Sixth' to end of §3.4, p. 63 last ¶ of §3.5. |
|
6 |
M 9/28 | Discuss First Paper; Philosophy Paper FAQ and Topics. |
|
W 9/30 | Reductionism |
Huemer, EI, §4.1. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), 1-5. Huemer, EI, §4.2. |
|
F 10/2 | The Open Question Argument | Moore, from Principia Ethica (1903), §§5-7, 9-10, and esp. 13. Ayer, "Critique of Ethics and Theology" re-read 104-105. Heathwood, "Reductionism in Ethics" (2013), the rest; |
|
7 |
M 10/5 | The Open Question Argument [slides for Reductionism] |
Ross, The Right and the Good (1930), 19-20, 28-34, 40-41; Huemer, EI, §§5.1-5.4 |
W 10/7 | First Paper Due [Combined Handout on Metaethics] Intuitionism and Nihilism |
||
F 10/9 | Intuitionist Moral Epistemology Mackie's Arguments |
Mackie, "The Subjectivity of Values" (1977) Huemer, EI, §5.5 |
|
8 |
M 10/12 | Moral Disagreement [slides for Intuitionism] |
Huemer, EI, ch. 6 |
W 10/14 | Review for Midterm Part 1 | ||
F 10/16 | Midterm Part 1 | ||
9 |
M 10/19 | Return Midterm Part 1; Review for Midterm Part 2 | |
W 10/21 | Midterm Part 2 BRING A BLUEBOOK! | ||
F 10/23 | NO CLASS | ||
10 |
M 10/26 | Intro to Normative Ethics | |
W 10/28 | Intro to Normative Ethics; Refuting Moral Theories; Slides for Intro to NEB |
Mill, from Utilitarianism (1863) Feldman, "What is Act Utilitarianism?" (1978) |
|
F 10/30 | Formulating Utilitarianism | Feldman, "Act Utilitarianism: Pro and Con" (1978), 30-41 |
|
11 |
M 11/2 | Understanding Utilitarianism | Feldman, "Problems for Act Utilitarianism" (1978) |
W 11/4 | The Organ Harvest Argument | Thomson, "Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem" (1976), §1 (the rest is optional) Radiolab, "Morality" (up to 13:40) |
|
F 11/6 | The Trolley Problem Reply to the Organ Harvest Arg. Rule Utilitarianism [Slides for Utilitarianism] |
Boonin and Oddie, "Arguments from Analogy" (2005) Feldman, "Rule Utilitarianism" (1978), 61-67 (rest optional) Smart, "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism" (1956) |
|
12 |
M 11/9 | Introduction to Axiology and Welfare | |
W 11/11 | Hedonism |
Heathwood, "Welfare" (2010) Bentham, excerpt from IPML (1781) |
|
F 11/13 | The Experience Machine | Nozick, "The Experience Machine" (1974) | |
13 |
M 11/16 | Desire Satisfactionism |
Heathwood, "Faring Well and Getting What You Want" (2014) |
W 11/18 | Objective List Theory |
Rice, "Defending the Objective List Theory" (2013) |
|
F 11/20 | Finish Welfare [Slides for Welfare] |
OPTIONAL: Parfit, "What Makes Someone's Life Go Best" (1984) |
|
M 11/23 - F 11/27: T H A N K S G I V I N G B R E A K |
|||
14 |
M 11/30 | Deontology; Rossian Pluralism Paper Topics Posted |
Ross, "What Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), 16-31, 41-42 |
W 12/2 | Assessing Deontology [Slides for Deontology] |
Ross, "What Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), 31-42 | |
F 12/4 | Second paper due FCQ's Impromptu Presentations |
||
15 |
M 12/7 | Review for Final, Part 1 (do study guide in advance) |
|
W 12/9 | Final Exam, Part 1 |
||
F 12/11 |
Review for Final, Part 2 (do study guide in advance) | ||
Fin |
Th 12/17 | Final Exam, Part 2: Thursday, Dec. 17, 7:30 p.m., in our room. BRING A BLUEBOOK! Make-Up Day & Time: Sunday, Dec. 13, 1:00 p.m., in our room. BRING A BLUEBOOK! |
Accommodations for Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations because of a
disability, please give me a letter from Disability Services
in a timely manner (for exam accommodations you must provide your letter at least one
week prior to the exam) so that your needs can be addressed. Disability
Services determines accommodations based on documented disabilities. Contact
Disability Services at 303-492-8671 or by e-mail at dsinfo@colorado.edu. If you have a temporary medical condition or injury, see Temporary Injuries guidelines under the Quick
Links at the Disability Services website and discuss your
needs with your professor.
Religious Observances
Campus policy regarding religious observances requires
that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with all students
who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with scheduled exams,
assignments or required attendance. Please let me know well in
advance about any such conflicts, and we'll work together to resolve them. See campus policy regarding religious observances for full details.
Students and faculty each have responsibility for
maintaining an appropriate learning environment. Those who fail to adhere to
such behavioral standards may be subject to discipline. Professional courtesy
and sensitivity are especially important with respect to individuals and topics
dealing with differences of race, color, culture, religion, creed, politics,
veteran’s status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and gender
expression, age, disability, and nationalities. Class rosters are provided to
the instructor with the student's legal name. I will gladly honor your request
to address you by an alternate name or gender pronoun. Please advise me of this
preference early in the semester so that I may make appropriate changes to my
records. For more information, see the policies on classroom behavior and the student code.
Discrimination And Harassment
We at the University of Colorado Boulder are
committed to maintaining a positive learning, working, and living environment.
CU-Boulder will not tolerate acts of discrimination or harassment based upon
Protected Classes or related retaliation against or by any employee or student. For purposes of this CU-Boulder policy, "Protected Classes" refers to
race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy, age, disability, creed, religion,
sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, veteran status,
political affiliation or political philosophy. Individuals who believe they
have been discriminated against should contact the Office of Institutional
Equity and Compliance (OIEC) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of Student Conduct
and Conflict Resolution (OSC) at 303-492-5550. Information about the OIEC, the
above referenced policies, and the campus resources available to assist
individuals regarding discrimination or harassment can be found at the OIEC website. The full policy on discrimination and harassment contains additional information.
Honor Code
All students of the University of Colorado Boulder are responsible for
knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy of this
institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating, plagiarism, aid
of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery, and threatening behavior. All
incidents of academic misconduct shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu;
303-735-2273). Students who are found to be in violation of the academic
integrity policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty
member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to university
probation, suspension, or expulsion). Additional information regarding the Honor Code policy can be found online and at
the Honor Code Office.
Anyone caught violating CU's academic integrity policy (in any way) will automatically receive an F for this course, and may be subject to expulsion from the university. I take cheating very seriously.