Syllabus
PHIL 1100 -- Ethics
Section 880 (honors)
Fall 2021
Tu/Th 2:20 - 3:35 p.m.
INFO 158
Professor
Chris Heathwood
heathwood@colorado.edu
Office: Hellems 278
Hours: Tuesdays 4:00-5:30;
Fridays 11:00-12:30; and by appointment on Tuesdays,
Thursdays, and Fridays
Course
Description
This course provides an introduction to ethics by way of a
study of doctrines and arguments in the normative ethics of
behavior (the theory of right and wrong) and some of their
applications to practical ethics. Our goals are to
understand some major theories and positions in these areas;
to understand and evaluate important arguments for and against
these theories; and to come to our own reasoned views on these
issues. Our topics will include simple logic and
critical thinking, divine command theory, cultural relativism,
utilitarianism, a utility-based position on abortion, rights
theory, a rights-based position on abortion, moderate
deontology, and a deontological position on U.S. slave
reparations.
Course
Website
The course website, which you should check regularly, can be
found here:
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/1100hFA21/.
Here you will find:
Readings
There will be no book! All readings are online and are
or will be linked below on the course schedule. You will
need a password to access some of them, which I will give you
in class and by email.
Lecture
Slides
I will be using slides in lecture,
which I will make available via links on the course schedule
below. But the availability of these slides is no
substitute for good note-taking. Many important details
are not on the slides!
Class Mates
So that you will have someone from whom to get the notes and
other pertinent information should you miss class, introduce
yourself to two of your classmates, and get their email
addresses and phone numbers.
Course
Requirements
1. Technology.
You must have an email account and regular access to the
internet, and you must check your colorado.edu email address
and the course website frequently.
Classrooms should be free from external
intrusions, so except for possible occasional times when we
want to look something up as a class, our classroom will be an
internet-free zone. Thus, please silence your cell phone
when you get to class. And please never text in
class. If you need to communicate with someone from the
outside world during class, no problem — just step outside of
the room to do so.
2. Three Exams (45%): There will be three exams, roughly evenly distributed throughout the semester (probably in weeks 6, 11, and finals week). Each exam is an in-class, closed-note, bluebook exam. To help you prepare, and to give you an idea about the sorts of questions you can expect, a study guide will be made available before each exam. Furthermore, we will have a review day before each part of each exam where I will take your questions about the study guide. You should come prepared for these review sessions by having already written out your own answers to the questions on the study guide.
If you miss an exam during the semester, you will be permitted to take a makeup exam only if you have a legitimate, documented excuse (e.g., non-trivial illness, death in the family, religious obligation). If you need to miss an exam, let me know in advance.
3. Two Papers (25%): Two papers are required. The first one, worth 10% of your grade for the course, will be due fairly early on (around week 4), and the second, worth 15%, will probably be due in the last week of the semester (week 15). Finalized due dates will eventually be put on the course schedule below. The topic and a detailed structure for the first paper will be provided for you. The second paper will be more open-ended option. I'll have more to say about papers in class, and I have a Philosophy Paper FAQ, which you should get to know.
Late papers will be penalized unless you
have a legitimate, documented excuse; the penalty is 1/3 of a
letter grade per day late (see the Philosophy
Paper FAQ for more details on this).
4. A Bunch of
Reading Quizzes (15%):
There will be quite a few pop quizzes
throughout the semester. These quizzes are designed to
test that you are doing and understanding the readings, and to
give you an incentive never to miss class. For each
reading, there will be a set of Reading Questions posted on
the website. All of the questions on the pop quizzes
will be taken directly from these reading questions.
Furthermore, these quizzes are open-note. Thus, as you
are doing each reading and taking notes on it, you should
write down each question in your notes and then write your
answer to it, which you can find by reading, studying, and
re-reading the reading. Then bring these notes with you
to class. All of the answers to the pop-quiz questions
should then be right in your notes! So, yes, there is no
reason that you all shouldn't ace all of the reading quizzes.
Quizzes are not restricted to readings that were due on the day of the quiz. They might cover readings that were due on earlier days.
You are permitted to use notes only that
you yourself created from doing the reading; you cannot use or
copy a classmate's notes. Though the pop quizzes are
open-note, they are not open-book or "open-reading."
You can drop your lowest quiz score.
If you miss a quiz due to missing class or being late, you'll
use that up.
You'll be filling out a Questionnaire the
first week of class, and I'll start your quiz scores out right
by having merely filling this out as counting as a perfect
score for your first quiz score.
5.
Participation in Class
Discussions (15%).
Since this is a small honors class, I want to have plenty of
discussion and class participation, and to hear regularly from
everyone. Consequently, participating in class
discussions will be a fairly significant part of the grade
(15%). So that I can keep track of your participation in
a reliable manner and also make sure that I am giving everyone
equal opportunity to participate, we're going to make use of a
little system. You will each receive four color-coded,
single-use cards: a pink one (highest priority, use first); a
yellow one (medium-high priority, use next); and a green one
(medium-low priority, use next); and a white one (lowest
priority, use last). You'll write your name on each of
your cards. When you want to ask a question or make a
comment, raise the highest priority card that you have, just
as you would raise your hand. I'll call on pink cards
first, then yellow, then green, then white (so I'll call on a
yellow card only if there are no pink cards raised, I'll call
on a green card only if there are no pink and yellow cards
raised; I'll call on a white card only if there are no pink,
yellow, or green cards raised; and I'll call on an empty hand
only if there are no cards raised). When I call on you,
I’ll collect your card.
The system is designed to have everyone
participate at least once a week, on average. In order
to get full credit in the participation category in a given
period, you need to use all three of your cards during that
period. At the beginning of the next period, I’ll
redistribute the cards. The periods will be the periods
between the exams.
No more than one card can be used on a single
day. However, you can still participate more than
once on a given day. If you have already used a card on
a given day or have already used of all four of your cards
during a period, you are still very much encouraged to
continue participating; simply raise your hand with no card in
it.
More about the card system:
I recognize that speaking in
front of a group is scary for almost everyone and that,
for some students, it is very difficult.
I hope you will use this opportunity to work on working on
this fear in a friendly, supportive environment; you'll be
glad you did. However, if you have serious social
anxiety or for some other reason absolutely, positively
cannot talk in class, let me know. We'll work
together to come up with an alternative way for you to get
discussion credit.
Grading
Your final grade for the course is determined according to the
following scheme:
First paper |
20 points |
First
Exam |
30 points |
Second
Exam |
30 points |
Second Paper | 30 points |
Third
Exam |
30 points |
Reading
Quizzes |
30 points |
Participation | 30 points |
TOTAL |
200 points |
Though it's possible that I might offer
extra-credit for something if the opportunity arises, please
don't ask if you can do extra credit to boost your
grade. If you want to get a good grade, do the actual
work that the class asks you to do. That is, don't miss
class, always arrive on time, always do the reading, take
notes on readings and in class, ask questions when you have
them, contribute to class discussions, start working on your
papers early, start working on the study guides for exams well
in advance, work on these study guides by actually writing out
your answers to the questions on them (as you would have to do
if it were a question on the real exam), come to the review
sessions having already put a lot of work into the study
guides, come to office hours when you are confused about the
material, and arrange study groups with your classmates.
We will use a standard "non-curved"
grading scale, as follows:
176-179 | B+ | 156-159 | C+ | 136-139 | D+ | ||||
185-200 | A | 165-175 | B | 145-155 | C | 125-135 | D | 0-119 |
F |
180-184 | A– | 160-164 | B– | 140-144 | C– | 120-124 | D- |
Course Schedule (subject
to change)
Wk.
|
Date | Topic (links below are to lecture slides) |
Readings
(Reading Questions are here) (due on date listed; subject to change) |
1
|
Tu 8/24 | Introductions, Roll; Syllabus | |
Th 8/26 | What is Philosophy? Logic, Truth, Validity, Soundness Questionnaire Due Sunday 8/29 |
this syllabus Shafer-Landau, "Introduction" (2011) |
|
2
|
Tu 8/31 | The Normative Ethics
of Behavior [Slides for Philosophy, Ethics, Logic] |
Rachels, "What is Morality?" (2009) |
Th 9/2 | The Normative Ethics
of Behavior [Slides for Intro to Normative Ethics of Behavior] Religious Approaches to Ethics |
Mortimer, "Morality is Based on
God's Commands" (1950) |
|
3
|
Tu 9/7 | The Euthyphro Problem First Paper Assignment |
Plato, from Euthyphro
(~380 B.C.E.) Philosophy Paper FAQ |
Th 9/9 | Finish Religious Approaches [Slides for Religious Approaches] |
Antony, "Good Minus God" (2011) | |
4
|
Tu 9/14 |
Sociological Approaches to Ethics First Paper Due |
Benedict, from "Anthropology and the
Abnormal" (1934) Herodotus, from Histories (~450 B.C.E.) Rachels, "Challenge of Cultural Relativism" (2003), §§2.1-2.3 OPTIONAL: Rae Ellen Bichell, "When People Ate People, A Strange Disease Emerged" (2016) |
|
Th 9/16 | Cultural
Relativism and Tolerance The Cultural Differences Argument Study Guide for Exam 1 |
Lewis, from Mere
Christianity (1958) Rachels, "Challenge of Cultural Relativism" (2003), §§2.4-2.8 |
5
|
Tu 9/21 | Arg. from the Eval. of
Cultures Gallup Poll [Slides for Cultural Relativism] |
Midgley, "Trying Out One's New
Sword" (1981) |
Th 9/23 | Review for Exam 1 |
(work on Study
Guide for Exam 1) |
|
6
|
Tu 9/28 | Exam 1
BRING A BLUEBOOK! |
|
|
Th 9/30 | Introducing Act Utilitarianism | Mill, from Utilitarianism
(1863), pp. 1-4 (2/3 of the way down p. 4) Feldman, "What is Act Utilitarianism?" (1978), pp. 16-26 |
Tu 10/5 |
Act
Utilitarianism Explained and Explored |
Mill, from Utilitarianism
(1863), rest Feldman, "Act Utilitarianism: Pro and Con" (1978), pp. 36-41. Askell, "Vegetarianism, Abortion, and Moral Empathy" (2016) Marquis, "Why Abortion is Immoral" (1989), thru §II |
|
Th 10/7 | A
Utility-Based Position on Abortion |
Marquis, "Why Abortion is Immoral" (1989), rest | |
Tu 10/12 | A
Utility-Based Position on Abortion Problems for Act Utilitarianism |
Feldman, "Problems for Act
Utilitarianism" (1978) |
|
Th 10/14 | Finish
Utilitarianism [Slides for Utilitarianism] |
Rachels (2003), "Should We Be Equally Concerned for Everyone?" | |
9
|
Tu 10/19 | Introducing Rights Theory | Nozick, from Anarchy,
State, and Utopia (1974),
26-33 Tännsjö, "Moral Rights" (2008), pp. 73-80. |
Th 10/21 | Rights Theory |
Tännsjö, "Moral
Rights," (2008), pp. 80-89. |
|
10
|
Tu 10/26 | A Rights-Based
Position on Abortion Study Guide for Exam 2 |
Thomson,
"A Defense of Abortion" (1971),
thru §4 (p. 59) |
Th 10/28 | Problems for Rights
Theory [slides for Rights Theory] |
Locke, some excerpts from his Two
Treatises of Government (1690):
pp. 106-111 (§4-§14);
pp. 30-31 (§42); p. 116 (§26). Thomson, "A Defense of Abortion," the rest |
|
11
|
Tu 11/2 | Review for Exam 2 |
(work on Study Guide for Exam 2) |
Th 11/4 | Exam 2 BRING A BLUEBOOK! | ||
12
|
Tu 11/9 | Ross and Prima Facie Duties | Ross, "What Makes Right Acts Right?" (1930), 16-31 (thru ¶29), 41-42 (¶45). |
Th 11/11 | Rossian Pluralism |
Ross, "What Makes
Right Acts Right?" (1930), 34-42 (¶¶34-45). |
|
13
|
Tu 11/16 | Additional Possible
Duties Ross's Argument from Promises against Utilitarianism |
Ross, "What Makes
Right Acts Right?" (1930), re-read ¶34 (pp. 34-5) Boonin, "Don't Know Much About (Black) History" (2011), 7-16 |
|
Th 11/18 | Second Paper
Assignment Is Deontology Irrational? |
Boonin, "The State of the Union(s)"
(2011), 16-20. Robinson, "America's Debt to Blacks" (2000) |
M 11/22 - F 11/26: T H A N K S G
I V I N G B R E A K
|
|||
14
|
Tu 11/30 | FCQs A Deontological Position on U.S. Slave Reparations Robinson's Argument |
Boonin, "The
Compensation Argument" (2011) |
Th 12/2 | Other Arguments [slides for Slave Reparations] Second Paper Due MON DEC 6 Study Guide for Exam 3 |
Horowitz, "Ten Reasons Why Reparations for
Blacks is a Bad Idea for Blacks – and Racist Too"
(2001) Coates and Hughes, "Should America pay reparations for slavery? Ta-Nehisi Coates v Coleman Hughes" (2019) (Or watch the video instead: Coates; Hughes) |
|
15
|
Tu 12/7 | Impromptu Paper Presentations? More Arguments on Slave Reparations? Why Be Moral? |
(no
new readings, so you can work on your final paper) |
|
Th 12/9 | Review for
Exam 3 |
(work on Study Guide) |
16
|
F 12/10 W 12/15 |
Exam
3 BRING
A BLUEBOOK! Alternative Exam 3 time/place: FRI DEC 10, 1:30-2:45 p.m., HLMS 177 Assigned Exam 3 time/place: WED DEC 15, 4:30-5:45 p.m., INFO 158 |
Classroom Behavior
Both students and faculty are
responsible for maintaining an appropriate learning
environment in all instructional settings, whether in
person, remote or online. Those who fail to adhere to such
behavioral standards may be subject to discipline.
Professional courtesy and sensitivity are especially
important with respect to individuals and topics dealing
with race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy, age,
disability, creed, religion, sexual orientation, gender
identity, gender expression, veteran status, political
affiliation or political philosophy. For more
information, see the policies on classroom
behavior and the Student
Conduct & Conflict Resolution policies.
Requirements for Covid-19
As a matter of public health and safety due to the
pandemic, all members of the CU Boulder community and all
visitors to campus must follow university, department, and
building requirements and all public health orders in place
to reduce the risk of spreading infectious disease. Students
who fail to adhere to these requirements will be asked to
leave class, and students who do not leave class when asked
or who refuse to comply with these requirements will be
referred to
Student Conduct and Conflict
Resolution. For more information, see the
policy on classroom behavior and
the Student Code of Conduct.
If you require accommodation
because a disability prevents you from fulfilling these
safety measures, please follow the steps in the
“Accommodation for Disabilities” statement on this
syllabus.
As of Aug. 13, 2021, CU Boulder has
returned to requiring masks in classrooms and laboratories
regardless of vaccination status. This requirement is a
temporary precaution during the delta surge to supplement CU
Boulder’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement. Exemptions include
individuals who cannot medically tolerate a face covering,
as well as those who are hearing-impaired or otherwise
disabled or who are communicating with someone who is
hearing-impaired or otherwise disabled and where the ability
to see the mouth is essential to communication. If you
qualify for a mask-related accommodation, please follow the
steps in the “Accommodation for Disabilities” statement on
this syllabus. In addition, vaccinated instructional faculty
who are engaged in an indoor instructional activity and are
separated by at least 6 feet from the nearest person are
exempt from wearing masks if they so choose.
Students who have
tested positive for COVID-19, have symptoms of COVID-19,
or have had close contact with someone who has tested
positive for or had symptoms of COVID-19 must stay home.
In this class, if you are sick or quarantined, please let
me know by email.
Accommodations
for Disabilities
If you
qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please
submit your accommodation letter from Disability Services to
your faculty member in a timely manner so that your needs
can be addressed. Disability Services determines
accommodations based on documented disabilities in the
academic environment. Information on requesting
accommodations is located on the Disability Services website.
Contact Disability Services at 303-492-8671 or dsinfo@colorado.edu for
further assistance. If you have a temporary medical
condition, see Temporary Medical Conditions
on the Disability Services website.
Preferred Student Names and
Pronouns
CU Boulder recognizes that
students' legal information doesn't always align with how
they identify. Students may update their preferred names and
pronouns via the student portal; those preferred names and
pronouns are listed on instructors' class rosters. In the
absence of such updates, the name that appears on the class
roster is the student's legal name.
Honor Code
All students enrolled in a
University of Colorado Boulder course are responsible for
knowing and adhering to the Honor Code academic
integrity policy. Violations of the Honor Code may
include, but are not limited to: plagiarism, cheating,
fabrication, lying, bribery, threat, unauthorized access
to academic materials, clicker fraud, submitting the same
or similar work in more than one course without permission
from all course instructors involved, and aiding academic
dishonesty. All incidents of academic misconduct will be
reported to the Honor Code (honor@colorado.edu); 303-492-5550). Students
found responsible for violating the academic integrity
policy will be subject to nonacademic sanctions from the
Honor Code as well as academic sanctions from the faculty
member. Additional information regarding the Honor Code
academic integrity policy can be found on the Honor
Code website.
Sexual Misconduct, Discrimination,
Harassment, Related Retaliation
The
University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) is committed to
fostering an inclusive and welcoming learning, working, and
living environment. CU Boulder will not tolerate acts of
sexual misconduct (harassment, exploitation, and assault),
intimate partner violence (dating or domestic violence),
stalking, or protected-class discrimination or harassment by
or against members of our community. Individuals who believe
they have been subject to misconduct or retaliatory actions
for reporting a concern should contact the Office of
Institutional Equity and Compliance (OIEC) at 303-492-2127
or email cureport@colorado.edu. Information about OIEC, university
policies, reporting
options, and the campus
resources can be found on the OIEC
website.
Please know that faculty and graduate
instructors have a responsibility to inform OIEC when made
aware of incidents of sexual misconduct, dating and
domestic violence, stalking, discrimination, harassment
and/or related retaliation, to ensure that individuals
impacted receive information about their rights, support
resources, and reporting options.
Religious Holidays
Campus policy
regarding religious observances requires that faculty make
every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with all students
who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with
scheduled exams, assignments or required attendance. In this class,
please let me know far in advance if you have any such
conflicts and we will work in out. See the campus policy regarding religious
observances for full details.