Martin
Luther King, Jr.
Black Studies
302030
F Ketchum
Spring, 1993
W, 0900-1130
ABA
William M. King
492-8189; 499-1659
I.
Synopsis
Justice, love and
hope. Racism, poverty and war. The first describes the
man, Martin Luther King, Jr. and his goals; the second
describes the issues of his time. From November, 1955,
until his death on 4 April 1968, King was a significant
player on the public stage. During these years, we know
him principally as a civil rights leader and antiwar
activist. However, he was much more. Indeed, now that
there is a federal holiday symbolizing what he stood for,
what he believed, and the goals he sought, there is the
danger of forgetting that he was a man subject to the
shortcomings of any man; that his agenda of realizing the
Beloved Community, where people are evaluated in terms of
the content of their characters rather than the color of
their skins, is only partially realized and in danger of
being reversed. Not only has the United States become
more conservative and less humane in the years since his
death, it seeks now to redefine and reposition itself as
a nation in preparation for the coming of the new
century. This new positioning will further distance it
from a sensitive and conscious attention to its domestic
needs resulting in a more oppressive and less democratic
society than was the case before. Thus, the focus of this
course is directed toward understanding the man, his
times and the work he was about before he was brutally
assasinated while lending moral support to a garbage
collector's strike in Memphis, Tennessee.
II. Materials and
Methods of Instruction
A. Background
readings:
David L.
Lewis, King, A Biography
James Melvin
Washington, A Testament of Hope
B. Supplementary
readings.
These are on
reserve in Norlin Library. They are intended to
supplement the background readings and amplify various
of the course topics.
C. Methods of
Instruction
1.
Structurally, this course is organized around several
significant events in the life of Martin Luther King,
Jr. They are: Origins and early training; the
Montgomery Bus Boycott; The Era of "nonviolence;" The
Challenge of Black Power and the war in Vietnam; and
the meaning of Martin Luther King, Jr. in this day and
at this time.
2. Operationally,
the course is intended more as forum than lecture.
What this means is that you must prepare for each
class session because it is likely that you will be
asked to offer a synopsis of and opinion on the
materials you have read and participate in student-led
small discussion groups at each meeting. Accordingly,
to successfully transit the course, you are required
first, to take responsibility for the quality of your
own education because education, as distinct from
schooling, is a participatory process; the instructor
helps those who help themselves. To learn you must
question: what you know, what you believe, and, what
you have previously taken on faith. Second, you must
acquire discipline which will assist you in securing
mastery over whatever talents you possess. No matter
how much talent you believe you have, if you have no
discipline, you have no talent. And third, you must
commit to excellence however you choose to define that
word.
III. Topical
Outline of the Course
A. Black History and
Black Protest
B. The Black Church as
Vehicle for Black Liberation
C. A Biography of
Martin Luther King, Jr.
D. Martin Luther King,
Jr.: Some Aspects of his Theology
E. The Montgomery Bus
Boycott
F. The Era of
"Nonviolence"
G. The Challenge of
Black Power
H. The Reemerging
Revolutionary Consciousness of the Reverend Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr.
I. Death and
Transfiguration
J. The Meaning of
Martin Luther King, Jr.
IV. Measures and
Methods of Performance Evaluation
There will be three
measures of performance evaluation used in this course
this term. Two are written, one is observational. The two
written items are worth eighty-five (85) percent of your
final grade (45 and 40 respectively), while the
observational is worth fifteen(15) percent of the
same.
A. The late
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was of the
opinion that a man is not fully alive until he has
found something for which he is willing to die.
Utilizing that notion as conceptual model, our task
this semester is one of increasing self-awareness by
focusing on two questions: "What for me is important
?" and "What am I willing to do to get what I want?"
Accordingly, in the first of your two written
assignments this term, you will line out a response to
question one (1) listing those items that are
important for you ordinally in terms of their
significance for you. Next, you will describe and
explain the ways in which these items are important
and how they came to be so. In doing this you might
want to use King's life as witness for elucidating the
ways struggle builds character.
In the second of
your two written assignments, you will address the
second question beginning first with a summary
reiteration of your responses to question one. Since
all action transpires within a value framework that
gives it meaning, I want you to describe and detail
your values as best you can. Having done that you will
then be ready to say what you are willing to do to get
what you want. After doing this, I wish you to
consider the consequences of your proposed actions for
yourself, others and the arenas within which you
operate over as broad a range and scope as you can.
Since there are no "correct" answers to either of
these questions, you are encouraged to trust your
feelings in responding to the assignment.
The first question
is due in my mailbox in Room 30 Ketchum Building not
later than 1700, Friday, 5 March 1993.
The second is due
in the same place not later 1700, Friday, 30 April
1993.
NOTE WELL: LATE
SUBMISSIONS WILL RESULT IN LOWERED GRADES.
B. Class
participation.
It is expected that
you will read the assigned materials and be prepared to
discuss them when you come to class, and also raise
questions where such questions are warranted. To assist
you in this regard, class participation will account for
the remaining fifteen (15) percent of your final
grade.
C. THE DAY MY
EVALUATION OF YOUR WORK TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE
PROCESSES OF ITS CREATION IN IMPORTANCE, YOU HAVE A
PROBLEM. NOT ONLY IS GRADING NOT FAIR AND NOT OBJECTIVE,
IT HAS VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH EDUCATION. PURELY AND
SIMPLY, IT IS THE EXERCISE OF POWER THROUGH THE AUTHORITY
OF THE TEACHER. ITS END IS PURPOSELY POLITICAL: TO LIMIT
ACCESS TO A SMALLER AND MORE ELITE GROUP.
D. All work submitted
must be an original copy. No reproductions
(Xerox, mimeo, ditto, e.g.) will be accepted. Printer
users: please remember to tear your sheets. Too, make
sure you keep a copy of the work you submit--papers do
get lost.
E. Since each of us
has a different image of what a specific grade means, I
offer herewith what the various letters mean for
me.
1. "A."
Easily evident mastery of the materials. A neat,
solid, tightly organized presentation in which you
make your case with authority.
2. "B." A solid
work but unimaginative in character. Covers all the
bases but rarely transcends the party-line to express
new insights or understandings.
3. "C." Mediocre
presentation. Follows the letter not the spirit of the
assignment. Lacks substance, effort, care and
concern.
4. "D." A weak and
ineffectual presentation. A thoroughly disorganized
endeavor from start to finish.
F. GRADES SHALL BE
DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF HOW EFFECTIVELY YOU ADDRESS
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA.
1.
Appropriate evidence of a thorough review of the
pertinent literature for your work. This will be shown
through the compilation of a significant bibliography,
where warranted, addressing the major and minor
aspects of your project. 15.
2. Demonstrated
understanding of your project, its supporting
materials, and its relations. This will be reflected
in the thought, detail, and examination of issues
(indicators of rigor, discipline and skill) which
appear in your paper. In short, how completely you
have developed the character of your presentation.
35.
3. Effective
transmission of the meanings you have made of your
labors. This will be reflected in the organization of
the work (form) and the manner (style) with which they
are communicated. To achieve maximum impact and
effectiveness, purpose, direction, focus, proper
distribution of emphases and evidence to support your
contentions must be clear; coherence and credibility
are important here. 35.
4. Errors in
composition. These include: neatness of final copy,
spelling, syntax, grammar, typing and verb/subject
agreements.